Answer:
Explanation:
Essay Segment or Quote Rubric Rating Comments
Briefly describe ONE major difference between Nash’s and Maier’s historical interpretations of the origins of the American Revolution.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Nash’s argument.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Maier’s argument.
3
2
1
The response to (a) did not earn a point because it is does not adequately describe the arguments of Nash and Maier. It merely lists the idea that Maier believed the Revolution emerged from old ideas, and Nash believed the Revolution was based on new ideas.
The response to (b) earned 1 point by providing evidence that the Boston Tea Party was a specific event that demonstrated the colonists’ rebellion against Great Britain’s taxation, which supports Nash’s argument. The response to
(c) did not earn a point because the Boston Massacre does not support Maier’s argument that the Revolution originated from earlier revolutionary thought.
Historians look for causes and effects that help to explain how and why events happened.
George Washington used Impressment to fight the British/loyalists
I don't know the movement but it was led by humanists so I'm guessing the humanist movement
Answer:
It led to many professional soldiers joining the insurgency and ISIS
Explanation:
The disarment of the soldiers created the ripple effect on the Iraqi country. This is because, they were not able to work and defend their country which they pledged loyalty to.
with the spiralling crises in Iraqi due to non-directionless government, majority had to join the insurgency and ISIS to fight for what they thought was right.
