The impact of migration from 2010 to 2017 created a large increase in immigrants in the continents of Africa and Europe.
During 2010-17 due to the expansion of population there was growth of slums and asylums.
- Most of the sub-Saharan moved to the European Union nations such as Norway and Sweden. Thus an over a seven-year period these refugees Most of the migrants came from Nigeria, Ghana, and Kenya.
- The possible impacts that the migrants made were seen in terms of financial support and gains.
Hence option B is correct, as more emigrants sent money home, this money helped in the growth of their country of origin.
Learn more about the From 2010 through 2017 there was a large increase in the number of migrants from Africa to Europe.
brainly.com/question/24814483.
Answer:
Explanation:
Which of the following is a precaution a worker should take to avoid on-the-job fall hazards?
Answer:
1775–1830
U.S. Indian policy during the American Revolution was disorganized and largely unsuccessful. At the outbreak of the war, the Continental Congress hastily recruited Indian agents. Charged with securing alliances with Native peoples, these agents failed more often than they succeeded. They faced at least three difficulties. First, they had less experience with Native Americans than did the long-standing Indian agents of the British Empire. Second, although U.S. agents assured Indians that the rebellious colonies would continue to carry on the trade in deerskins and beaver pelts, the disruptions of the war made regular commerce almost impossible. Britain, by contrast, had the commercial power to deliver trade goods on a more regular basis. And third, many Indians associated the rebellious colonies with aggressive white colonists who lived along the frontier. Britain was willing to sacrifice these colonists in the interests of the broader empire (as it had done in the Proclamation of 1763), but for the colonies, visions of empire rested solely on neighboring Indian lands. Unable to secure broad alliances with Indian peoples, U.S. Indian policy during the Revolution remained haphazard, formed by local officials in response to local affairs.