1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ICE Princess25 [194]
3 years ago
7

From the time of reconstruction until the 1970s, the democratic party in texas had very little competition. many claim that the

evolution to texas's present-day status as a predominantly republican state is the hallmark of a political , in which voters slowly switch allegiance from one political party to the other, and the latter party then dominates the political process.
History
1 answer:
Kobotan [32]3 years ago
3 0
Switch. Texas, like much of the South, was once solidly blue or Democrat. Many point to Johnson's support for civil rights and social welfare as the cause for why Texas shifted from Democrat to Republican.
You might be interested in
Who assisted the french in the area of trapping
sveticcg [70]
<span>The North American fur trade thats it cuz i know and french is good wit north america </span>
4 0
3 years ago
What is meant by a Loyalist? PLEASEEEEEEE HURRYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!​
asambeis [7]

Answer:

a Loyalist are those who support the British crown

3 0
3 years ago
The columbian exchange included the transfer of animals. which of the following is the most accurate statement regarding animals
Minchanka [31]
B) There were more animals capable of being domesticated in America than in Europe, Asia, and Africa?
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
Why did pilgrims move to the new world?
tia_tia [17]
They moved to the new world to practice religious freedom 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the scramble for africa affect african countries even after european imperialism in the region had ended?
    10·2 answers
  • what reasons does Jackson give for not believing a state possess the authority to resist federal laws according to that state´s
    6·1 answer
  • Under the Articles of Confederation, why didn’t the national government enforce the laws?
    7·2 answers
  • Which president recognized Japanese interests in Manchuria as a foreign policy
    5·1 answer
  • how did the Americans disagree over the role of the federal and state governments before and after the during the civil war?
    8·2 answers
  • Why was the capture of San Antonio such a great victory for the Texans?
    15·1 answer
  • How were Native Americans affected by the American Revolution?
    11·1 answer
  • 1. What are the basic steps in policymaking?
    7·2 answers
  • Read the amendment to answer the question *
    6·1 answer
  • What was the effetc of the american revolution to free their slaves
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!