I’m not pretty sure about this answer but in my opinion it’s B
Answer:
C) there is at least one fixed factor of production.
<u>Multiple-choice options</u>
A) there is increasing scarcity of factors of production.
B) the price of extra units of a factor is increasing.
C) there is at least one fixed factor of production.
D) capital is a variable input.
Explanation:
he law of diminishing marginal returns cites that adding extra input while maintaining the others fixed will cause the overall output to decrease . Adding one more production input while keeping the rest intact decreases the marginal returns and increases the average production cost.
The law only applies where there at least one fixed input. When the firm uses more of the variable input, the firm's marginal product will eventually decrease.
Answer:
60 billion
Explanation:
This might help you: The National Health Care Anti-fraud Association (NHCAA) conservatively estimates that 3 percent of all health care spending, or $60 billion, is lost to health care fraud.
Hope this helps :)
Have a nice day!
Answer:
D. Fundamental analysis would now show the corporation is undervalued. The fact that the price was unchanged is not consistent with the efficient markets hypothesis.
Explanation:
Under factors of production, we have Land ,labour ,capital and entrepreneur.
Labour are the prime movers of a business.If a new CEO with a good track record has been employed, then the value of the company will increase.
Technically, that Quadrangle Company has increased its production(which might mean that the goods and services they deliver to their clients has increased or the mode of delivery of services has been improved upon), the value is also meant to increase.
With all these indices in place, fundamental analysis will now show that the corperation is undervalued. so D
Fundamental analysis would now show the corporation is undervalued. The fact that the price was unchanged is not consistent with the efficient markets hypothesis
perfectly fits the answer
Answer:
<u>True</u>
Explanation:
If this $27,500 fine is actually per passenger, it could greatly incentivize airlines to cancel fewer flights than before. Consider that, most airline tickets are far lower than $27,500, so if airlines are paying fines worth many times more than they actually collect per individual tickets, they will incure great losses.
