<span>Buyer normally pays the transportation costs</span>
Answer: Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Sarah who is the controller of a large beverage supplier, supervises two employees and that her boss, Vladimir, told her to increase the company's inventory balance for an amount that is material to the financial statements by crediting several small "miscellaneous" expense accounts.
We are further told that Sarah does not know the reason behind this but told one of her staff to make them because she has been instructed to do so.
We can see that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue. She didn't evaluate the effect of what she is doing. In this case, what her boss told her to do could be a case of fraud and she just obliged without asking questions which will put her conscience at ease in case anything happens but the fact that she just did it without asking questions or thinking if what she has done is morally right or wrong, it shows that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": A car manufacturer installing expensive onboard GPS/navigation systems in all the cars it sells.
Explanation:
A tying agreement is the type of contractual arrangement where a seller offers other(s) product for the purchase of one good as a part of only one bundle. The secondary product might not be necessary but the seller offers it mainly to generate more profit. Tying arrangements are considered anti-competitive practices.
Answer:
$1,069.74
Explanation:
We use the present value formula which is shown in the attachment below:
Data provided in the question
Future value = $1,000
Rate of interest = 12%
NPER = 16 years
PMT = $1,000 × 13% = $130
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after solving this, the value of the bond is $1,069.74
Answer:
Benefits-received principle
Explanation:
This principle says that the people who benefit most from government assistance programs should be the one to pay for them. Regressive taxes represent a higher portion of money for low income families, with the idea that it is okay because the government provides more services for low income families.
