false,since the less the number the more cohesion
Answer: The Option "d.returning inventory that is defective or broken" is NOT an example of safeguarding inventory.
Explanation: If we analyze the statements:
a.physical devices such as two-way mirrors, cameras, and alarms - These are all tools intended for protection against possible inventory theft.
b.storing inventory in restricted areas - Restricting access only to inventory-enabled personnel is able to protect the inventory much more than if anyone can access it.
c.matching receiving documents, purchase orders, and vendor's invoice - Controlling each of the purchase documents and performing the physical count reduces the possibilities of inventory differences for losses or errors.
d.returning inventory that is defective or broken - Returning the defective inventory is a post-echo action that occurred due to the unprotection of the inventory, therefore it could not be referred to as an example of inventory protection.
Answer:
Sunk cost will be = $70
Explanation:
Sunk Cost refers to the cost for which the amount has been already spent, and cannot be recovered. These are generally incurred and then not regarded for decision making as irrespective of decision being viable or not this cost cannot be avoided.
In the given instance, Damon Rutton Purchased the ticket of $70
This is the only cost which has already been incurred, else other costs of parking and food will only be incurred if he visits the game of Sarasota Shippers.
When he spend some time with his wife sunk cost will be = $70
