Answer:
C. It is worth the loss of property to ensure that Germany finds nothing useful to it.
Explanation:
The given passage is taken from the "scorched earth" policy established by Joseph Stalin after the German troops invaded the USSR in 1941. The radio broadcast gave an order to the people on how to act when evading or leaving their homes.
In this broadcast, Stalin orders the destruction of <em>"All valuable property including non-ferrous metals, grain, and fuel which cannot be withdrawn"</em> so that it will not fall on the hands of the Germans. He also advised the farmers to<em> "drive off their cattle and turn over their grain to the safekeeping of the State authorities"</em>, so that if and when the Germans reach that place, they will not be used by them. The order seems to state that losing a property is better than providing any useful thing for the Germans.
Thus, the correct answer is option C.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Because were all human and besides we only live once
How would one know if there are no Answers to the question?
Looking like a zealous Party member, she wears an (ironic) Anti-Sex sash around her waist, and always participates passionately during the Two Minutes Hate. Julia's other side is much more interesting. ... Winston would sure like it to be the former, and Julia does suggest that her acts are her own small rebellion.
I think that there's definitely some physical attraction. And I think that they were excited by the illicit thrill they got of working against the party together, and that declaring themselves to be in love was another way to foster that rebellion. But honestly I feel like it really all feels more like the kind of teenage romance you get where partners are selected as much out of a desire for rebellion as they are out of any kind of compatibility.
Now, that doesn't mean that they couldn't have really loved each other. It's possible that the limited social (and literal) vocabulary both had just prevented them from demonstrating that their love was on par with that we might see from a pair of mature adults today. But it's enough of a gray area to muddy the analysis. While I personally would argue in favor of the "teenagers enjoying the thrill of sneaking out to have sex behind their parents' back" model, I can definitely see the other side as well. In the end, it's up to you to decide which perspective makes the most sense to you.
https://www.quora.com/How-do-Julia-and-Winston-feel-about-each-other-in-the-novel-1984
