1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SIZIF [17.4K]
3 years ago
12

What is odd about the dinner beorn offers his guests?

English
1 answer:
borishaifa [10]3 years ago
4 0
I dont know but you can look it up
You might be interested in
Guys give me the number for the answer. Which one these number are main idea?
kiruha [24]

I believe it is number 3 as it states that fire has been useful in many ways. The others are saying fire has been useful for specific things. The main idea should cover it all.

I hope this helps! Branliest?

8 0
3 years ago
Do not confuse theme with a story’s A subject B ending C moral
AlladinOne [14]
Is this a true or false question?
3 0
3 years ago
A summary of the new Jim Crow book version
enot [183]

Alexander details the history of “racialized social control” (20). From slavery to Jim Crow to mass incarceration, she identifies a persistent pattern by which systems of racial subjugation are built, maintained, dismantled, and finally transformed to fit the circumstances of a given era. In the case of mass incarceration, politicians like Ronald Reagan built the system to fit into a new post-Civil Rights Movement paradigm that prohibited politicians from making overtly racist appeals to American voters. In this new era of supposed colorblindness, Reagan—and later George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton—utilized “law and order” (50) rhetoric that implicitly demonized Black men as predators. In the middle of Reagan’s presidency, crack cocaine swept through urban communities of color, giving “tough on crime” advocates the perfect pretext to launch an aggressive drug enforcement campaign against Black American males.

 Alexander explains exactly how the new racial caste system works, beginning with its point of entry: the police. Empowered by Supreme Court decisions that effectively gutted the Fourth Amendment, police officers may stop and search individuals under the faintest pretexts of probable cause. Yet just because police departments can target millions of Americans suspected of possessing small amounts of drugs, the question remains of why they choose to divert time and resources away from addressing more serious crimes like murders and rapes. Alexander points to huge financial incentives offered by the federal government to encourage widespread enforcement of minor drug infractions. Massive federal cash grants and changes to civil asset forfeiture laws have made participation in the drug war extraordinarily lucrative for state and local police departments.

In the following chapter Alexander explores why, in many states, Black Americans make up as much as 80% to 90% of individuals who serve time in prison on drug charges, even though the system is formally colorblind and whites use and sell drugs at similar rates. Unlike in the case of robberies or assaults, where clear victims exist, those involved with drug transactions are unlikely to report them to the police because doing so would implicate themselves in a crime. As a result, police must be proactive in addressing drug crime and are therefore afforded an enormous amount of discretion concerning whom to target. As for why police departments choose to disproportionately target people of color, Alexander blames both implicit biases and pervasive media and political campaigns that frame Black men as criminals in the American imagination. Prosecutors are also granted an outsized amount of discretion thanks to the introduction of mandatory minimum sentences for drug criminals. With such harsh sentences hanging over the heads of those charged with drug crimes, prosecutors are better empowered to extract plea deals. While these plea deals may keep an individual out of jail, they also frequently result in a felony record, saddling that person for life with what Alexander calls “the prison label” (189). The consequences of this prison label are the focus of Chapter 4. When an individual leaves prison or accepts a felony plea deal, they face legal discrimination in employment, housing, welfare benefits, and often voting rights. It is here that Alexander observes the strongest similarities between mass incarceration and the Jim Crow era, given that Black Americans faced these same forms of discrimination during the first half of the 20th century in the South. She also addresses the stigma felt by everyone touched by the criminal justice system, which includes the formerly incarcerated, their families, and any individual who can expect daily harassment from police officers. The following chapter outlines the specific similarities and differences between Jim Crow and mass incarceration. Aside from the legal discrimination in both systems, Jim Crow and mass incarceration have similar political roots. Both systems gained political support from elites who sought to exploit the economic and cultural fears of poor and working-class whites. Both operate by defining what it means to be Black in America in the cultural imagination—in the case of mass incarceration, that means defining Black men as criminals. Perhaps the most significant and frightening difference is that while both slavery and Jim Crow were systems of labor exploitation, mass incarceration involves marginalization and removal from society. Alexander points out that similar racially based marginalization efforts were precursors to genocides in the 20th century.

3 0
3 years ago
In Mexico, local territories are called:
o-na [289]
The answer is B.Estados
8 0
3 years ago
Economic _________________ has increased both petty and violent crimes, turning some cities into murder capitals. deprivation in
Anvisha [2.4K]

Answer: Economic deprivation has increased both petty and violent crimes, turning some cities into murder capitals.

Explanation: Economic deprivation is a lack of basic necessities of life in a society. If an individual lacks some material benefits, important to an everyday life there is huge tendency that the individual will resort to crime.

The proponent of Conflict theory believes that the economically deprived set of people will revolt against those hoarding the scarce resources and using it for their own personal and selfish reason. Class struggle will ensue among the group of people.

Economic deprivation can reduce social trust and encourage disorganization in the society which can birth another social problem of people indulging in crimes.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write a letter to the minister of Education in which you describe the school of your dreams.
    13·1 answer
  • Why do people do risky things?what are some benefits ?some consequences?
    5·1 answer
  • What is your goal in life to keep yourself job free?
    6·1 answer
  • Is the sentence simple, compound, or complex? Anna and her friend visited the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City.
    5·1 answer
  • Why does looking at hareton torture Heathcliff?
    8·1 answer
  • WRITE A LETTER TO ANOTHER<br>COMMUNITY FOR A FRIEND<br>FRIEND MATCH​
    11·1 answer
  • Write a letter to the editor of a local newspaper highlighting your concern on the lack of charity seen in young people today.
    14·1 answer
  • Which excerpt taken from “Ballad of Birmingham” by Dudley Randall is an example of sensory imagery? “brushed her night-dark hair
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following historical events could have impacted Wells’ writing of The First Men in the Moon?
    11·1 answer
  • You have read two texts about the lost colonists of Roanoke, "Have We Found the Lost Colony of Roanoke Island?" and "What Happen
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!