Answer:
The Song dynasty (960-1279) follows the Tang (618-906) and the two together constitute what is often called "China's Golden Age." the inventions of gunpowder, the compass, and printing all occur under the Song.
One of the main purposes of the exchange of energy between the master drummers in brazil, the dancers, and the audience is to: Call on the Orixas for their blessings. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
energy?</h3>
Generally, Energy may be defined as the ability to conduct work. It is possible for it to exist in potential, kinetic, thermal, electrical, chemical, or nuclear forms, amongst other possible manifestations.
In conclusion, One of the primary goals of the energy exchange that takes place in Brazil between the master drummers, the dancers, and the audience is to ask the Orixas for their blessings. This is one of the fundamental aims of energy exchange.
Read more about energy
brainly.com/question/1932868
#SPJ1
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
Answer:
Colonizers were in the case of the Spanish, French and the Chesapeake Bay colony lower nobility, common folk, or indentured servants, while for New England they were religious migrants, and for Dutch settlements merchants and sailors.
Spanish and French proclaimed thier missionary role, and "rescue" of natives, and the colonies in New England also detailed their mission to construct a "city on the hill",while Dutch and English in Chesapeake both were aimed at maximizing profit.
The interaction with environments and natives was influenced by this aims, as Spanish and French colonies tried to assimilate natives like free subjects but with their speficic culture if that did not clash with the Catholic doctrine, and emphasizing conversion and tribute, in the specific case of the French via the fur trade, while for Spanish it would be the <em>encomienda</em> system and later the "hacienda" (latifundia). Dutch engaged primarily with natives as trading partners, not seeking integration, and also without transforming the environment. English for the other did change the environment and clashed with the Natives, althoug at first they used them as life support, due to their poor knowledge of the terrain, but eventually the colonist clashed with the natives.