Hello.
The most suitable option is Henry VIII sicen he was the creator of the Church of England and renounced to the papal authority. He had to pass laws such as the Dissolution of the Monasteries in order to control the land; he dissolved monasteries and kept with their incomes and also, this policy controlled their meetings for example.
Hope this helps.
Dictatorship is the answe
There is some disagreement about exactly when the Cold War began. While the majority of historians maintain that it began as soon as World War II ended, others affirm that the beginnings of the Cold War date back to the end of World War I, in the tensions that occurred between the Russian Empire, on the one hand , and the British Empire and the United States, on the other.The ideological clash between communism and capitalism began in 1917, after the triumph of the Russian Revolution, from which Russia emerged as the first socialist country. This was one of the first events that caused considerable erosions in Russian-American relations.
Before the Russian Revolution, support for dictators was often based on promoting US economic and political priorities, such as opening foreign markets to American manufacturers. After the rise of communism, the US government also began to support authoritarian regimes that felt they were fighting against movements aligned with communism, including socialist and social democratic movements, including Latin America. belief expressed by many that this contradicts the political ideals advocated by the United States during the Cold War, while others argued that such plans were executed in fear of Communism reaching Latin America and beginning to consolidate. The support was also oriented to ensure an environment conducive to US corporate purposes abroad, such as the United Fruit Company or Standard Oil, especially when they came under the threat of democratic regimes.The support for authoritarian regimes has been justified under various ideological frameworks, such as the Truman doctrine, Kirkpatrick doctrine or the "war on drugs".
Following the cold war policies, we can say that global intervention is a long-term plan based on maintaining the country's business businesses worldwide, ensuring that the legal and economic conditions are maintained for the business to prosper and be profitable.
In the plantations, male and female slaves were both responsible for all the planting, harvesting and cleaning of the fields under extremely harsh and inhumane conditions. The harvesting was carried out by broad curved machetes and afterwards the ripe sugar canes were loaded into carts and taken to the sugar cane mills erected in the plantation estates to be processed into sugar and its derivatives.
In the sugar cane mills, during the harvesting periods work was 24 hours none stop to meet up with supply deadlines as most of the machinery used were slow and inefficient.
In contrast to what happened in the plantation fields, the slave masters preferred female slaves working in the sugar cane mills. Theirs was a particularly hazardous and life-threatening responsibility as it involved pushing the sugar cane stalks into wooden and metal rollers to crush and extract the sugar cane juice and also operating the sugar cane broiler.
This preference was because:
- For economic reasons, though the slaves were bought, the human value of the slaves was never considered. The value of the end product was highly priced. Human slave life was easily replaced by the masters.
- And since working the sugar mills was a highly hazardous activity lives were frequently lost as the mill rollers were know to have crushed to death and maimed many slaves. In most parts of the world where African slaves were used, female slaves were sold at a cheaper value than their male counterparts. Therefore it stands to reason that the slaves masters would prefer the female slaves regarded as "cheaper replacements"
- Since work in the mills had to work 24 hours none stop, the environment had to be washed, swept frequently and kept clean to sustain a minimum level of cleaness and higiene. Female slaves were considered ideal for this as well.
Based on the quote, critics of NAFTA might have claimed that:
A) Mexican workers would be unfairly taken advantage of
<h3>What can be deduced about the critics of NAFTA from the text?</h3>
The critics of NAFTA believe that Mexico was not as strong as the other countries who entered the trade agreement so the possibility that they will be taken advantage of was there.
Having read the above statement from the 1993 agreement of NAFTA, we can see that the reference to the United Mexican states must have proved that the union was needed to stand side by side with the American and Canadian states.
Critics might have believed that Mexico was vulnerable and could be unfairly taken advantage of in the deal.
Learn more about NAFTA here:
brainly.com/question/27372794
#SPJ1
