Answer:
I absluotely agree with that statement about the Bahrain fort.
The answer is third-generation jail. The concept behind the emergence of third-generation jails is mainly to promote a more humane treatment to convicted inmates. Compared to the first and second- generation jails, third-generation jails were proven to be more successful in providing a more normalized environment and safety amongst inmates and the staff overseeing them. The inmates were provided with better basic commodities and recreational activities. This type of jail was also deemed safer than the old jail structures.
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
I believe it's A. If the birth rate and immigration is equal to the death rate and emigration, then they balance each other out. If birth rate and immigration is bringing people in and death rate and emigration is pushing people out, then they equal 0.
Faded feedback uses a high frequency of feedback early in practice and then gradually reduces feedback as the learner's skill begins to develop.
Faded feedback involves initial high-level assistance that gradually decreases as trainees advance through the training programme. However, as stated by Goodman and Wood (2009), faded feedback has very little empirical validity.
Their findings imply that trainees' "stuck in their ways" behavior was caused by faded feedback. In other words, trainees tend to continue performing in ways consistent with the feedback throughout the training course when they receive high levels of feedback early on.
Despite the intuitive attraction of faded feedback, Goodman and Wood's findings imply that this feedback strategy did not result in greater learning or increased training transfer when compared to the alternative.
Learn more about feedback here
brainly.com/question/26994432
#SPJ4
