1. The passenger
2. The name
3. Number of flight
4. Number of seat
I don't really know, but I would think they has a very orginised government that everyone agreed on
Answer:
You would be wise to highlight how much money they would lose if they didn't insulate.
Explanation:
Sherif and Nebarga's social judgment theory states that people's attitudes or positions on an insue depend on three aspects: anchor, alternatives and ego-involvement.
If you highlight how much money would they lose if they didn't insulate, you will be acting over anchor social judgment.
Their anchor is their preferred position on the issue, this is, the actual state of their homes without being insulated. If you highlight how much money they would lose if they didn't insulate, you're pointing out how their anchor would be affected if they didn't consider your offer to insulate their homes.
It’s false
Because it’s prenden not prende
Answer:
For this exercise we have to complete the sentences with the verb conjugated in future
Explanation:
In Spanish we can express future with the future simple that modifies the main verb in infinitive, all the verbs (ar, er, ir) have the same ending and it depends on the subject pronoun
yo -é
tú -ás
usted, él, ella -á
nosotros -emos
ustedes, ellos, ellas -án
1. Cuando el hombre se dé cuenta del daño que causan las industrias, (dejar) dejará (will stop) de contaminar el medio ambiente.
2. Si seguimos utilizando aerosoles (destruir) destruiremos (will destroy) aún más la capa de ozono.
3. ¿Crees que las compañías multinacionales (seguir) seguirán (will continue) explotando los recursos de la selva amazónica?
4. El país (deber) deberá (will have to) encontrar la manera de generar energía eléctrica sin destruir el paisaje natural.
5. Dentro de diez años, nuestra ciudad (estar) estará (will be) consumiendo más energía que en la actualidad.
6. La tormenta que viene (ser) será (will be) tan fuerte que (inundar) inundará (will flood) las calles.
