1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inysia [295]
3 years ago
11

Compare and contrast the U.S. constitution to the texas constitution

History
2 answers:
Allushta [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

While the U.S. Constitution applies to the federal government with the states being subordinate, the Texas Constitution (and all state constitutions) sets in writing what the state government can and cannot do with the counties being subordinate.

While similar to the U.S Constitution, the Texas Constitution has some striking differences, many of which can make it more difficult to file constitutionally based lawsuits under Texas law. One of the most striking differences between the Texas and U.S. Constitutions is length. The U.S. Constitution is intentionally brief and vague, which allows the federal government to broadly interpret it. The Texas Constitution was written leaving little room for interpretation to ensure it cannot be interpreted in a manner inconsistent with the constitution’s ideals.

The Texas Constitution gets its length from going into great detail. While the Texas Constitution grants Texans similar rights to the U.S. Constitution, the Texas Constitution is much more specific regarding exactly when these rights are infringed upon. While it may seem like this specificity would make legal matters cut and dry, in practice it can greatly complicate things.

Explanation:

Trust

nika2105 [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

While the U.S. Constitution applies to the federal government with the states being subordinate, the Texas Constitution (and all state constitutions) sets in writing what the state government can and cannot do with the counties being subordinate.

While similar to the U.S Constitution, the Texas Constitution has some striking differences, many of which can make it more difficult to file constitutionally based lawsuits under Texas law. One of the most striking differences between the Texas and U.S. Constitutions is length. The U.S. Constitution is intentionally brief and vague, which allows the federal government to broadly interpret it. The Texas Constitution was written leaving little room for interpretation to ensure it cannot be interpreted in a manner inconsistent with the constitution’s ideals.

The Texas Constitution gets its length from going into great detail. While the Texas Constitution grants Texans similar rights to the U.S. Constitution, the Texas Constitution is much more specific regarding exactly when these rights are infringed upon. While it may seem like this specificity would make legal matters cut and dry, in practice it can greatly complicate things.

Explanation:

Make sure to re-word it or use spinbot.com so you don't get caught plagiarizing

You might be interested in
Why is the 17th Amendment significant?
o-na [289]
The 17th Amendment is significant because B.  It requires the direct election of US senators by voters.

Here it is in its original form:

The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures.

When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.

This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who most benefited financially from the transcontinental railroad? A. homesteaders B. Chinese, Irish, and African Americans C. g
Harman [31]

I think its D, they would be able to ship livestock via railroad

6 0
3 years ago
After the emancipation proclamation the norths main goal was
adoni [48]

Answer:

to end slavery

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
What do guys know about the events before during and after 9/11?
astra-53 [7]

Answer:

before 9/11 the skys were normal empty and calm

during 9/11  there were two distint planes in the skys changing there routes

after 9/11 there was the smell of fear and death in the air the were familys missing there kids little boys missing there brothers

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why didn't the end of the atlantic slave trade mean an end to slavery?
Kitty [74]
There were still slaves in the United States as well as other countrie.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which theme of geography is represented when slash and burn agriculture leads to deforestation? A) Region B) Movement C) Relativ
    8·2 answers
  • Why did the Mongols have so much success in their military conquering campaign?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of Lyndon Johnson's leadership related to Vietnam?
    6·1 answer
  • Generally speaking, power can cause a person to _____.
    11·1 answer
  • Find the volume of a sphere with radius of 1<br>​
    10·2 answers
  • What were the Articles of Confederation? Describe both strengths and weaknesses.
    8·1 answer
  • How did scientific rationalism affect governments?
    5·2 answers
  • Tenochititan and The Aztec Empire were located in the modern day county of?​
    11·1 answer
  • John Tyler invoked Manifest Destiny ________.
    8·1 answer
  • What role did Albertina play​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!