1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ioda
4 years ago
8

Which sentence contains a nonrestrictive clause that is punctuated correctly? My boss—who was recently promoted again is great a

t motivating her employees. My boss, who was recently promoted again, is great at motivating her employees. My boss who was recently promoted again—is great at motivating her employees. My boss, who was recently promoted again is great at motivating, her employees.
English
2 answers:
madam [21]4 years ago
8 0

Answer: B IS THE RIGHT ANSWER

Explanation:

weeeeeb [17]4 years ago
5 0
<span>The correct answer is My boss, who was recently promoted again, is great at motivating her employees. That is because it has an appositive phrase that is separated by commas properly. Dashes wouldn't be used here because they are used in different situations, not to separate apposition.</span>
You might be interested in
What does Buck completing the task stand for?
frosja888 [35]

The correct answer is Buck’s love for Thornton. There is bet placed about Buck’s strength, stating that he will not be able to pull a thousand pound sled. The amount is huge: 1600 dollars. Buck is able to do it and win the large amount for John Thornton. Although as a dog he really does not even know what is going on, his instinct tells him that accomplishing this task will please Thornton and because he loves him that makes him happy. This increases their bonding and loyalty to each other.

5 0
3 years ago
I hereby authorize and direct the Secretary of War . . . Whenever he or any designated Commander deems such action necessary or
Liula [17]

Answer:

The words from the excerpt that best support the official nature of the document are:

"authorize" and "impose"

Explanation:

This official document is giving certain people permission and power. Notice that, throughout the text, we have several strong words, such as "authorize", "prescribe", "determine", and "impose". Those words help convey the sense of authority of the document and the people involved - those who have written it and those who are addressed by it. The same words, if used in an unofficial, regular document or text, would be considered rude, even arrogant. However, since this context does involve the delegation of power and authority, such words are acceptable and necessary.

6 0
3 years ago
It’s a studysync read the title is First Read: Remarks in Memory of the Victims of the Holocaust
valkas [14]

Answer:

What does the phrase Never Again mean to you?

Ans; As the Holocaust ended and people in the death camps were liberated, almost immediately survivors began to say: Never again. Never again would there be a systematic attempt to destroy the Jewish people. Never again would genocide devastate any ethnic, national, racial or religious group.

What is one example of genocide or country from the speech that surprised you the most?

Ans; The more popularly understood term for government murder is genocide, but there is a difference between democide and genocide as described in my "Democide versus Genocide: Which is What?", and which must be understood: in short, democide is a government's murder of people for whatever reason; genocide is the murder of people because of their race, ethnicity, religion, nationality, or language. The most infamous example of genocide was Nazi Germany's cold-blooded murder of near 6,000,000 Jews during World War II (see Table 1.1 from my Democide). Men, women, and children died simply because they were ethnic Jews. In Chapter 1, you also have read about the Burmese military genocide of the Karen minority; the Sudanese government's genocide of the Black Southern minority; the Chinese Communist Party's genocide of the Falun Gong; and in Chapter 5 you also read about the Mexican government's genocide of Indians. An example of nongenocidal democide is the Chinese Party and Burma's military murders of pro-democracy demonstrators; the Mexican and, in Chapter 1, the Saudi Arabian government's murders of political opponents; and, in Chapter 3, Stalin's deadly famine he imposed on the Ukraine.

If you have been living in a democracy all your life, you may find it difficult to accept the truth that governments murder people by the thousands and millions. I know that even some of my political science colleagues have resisted the thought. I could see them wince when at a conference or meeting, for example, I would say outright that Kim Il-sung, the deceased dictator of North Korea, is responsible for the murder of something like 1,700,000 people (see Table 15.1 from my Death By Government). You can easily call some person a murderer if they kill people in cold blood, as did London's famous "Jack the Ripper," who killed six or seven people in 1888; or the "Boston Strangler," Albert DeSalvo, who in 1962-1964 killed thirteen people. You may resist, however, calling a dictator a mass murderer, even when speaking of Uganda's Idi Amin, who physically took part in some murders carried out by his government, and was responsible for the violent deaths of some 300,000 of his subjects.

Table 6.1

Part of this reluctance to call a government or its ruler a murderer comes from the fact that to do so is a new and strange thought. Democide is a black hole in our textbooks, college teaching, and social science research. Few people know the extent to which governments murder people. In the twentieth century, the age of great advances in technology, medicine, wealth, and education, governments nonetheless probably murdered over 170,000,000 people, the worst of these murderous governments are listed in Table 6.1 here.1 This is more than four times those killed in combat in all international and national wars, including world wars I and II, Vietnam, Korea, the Mexican Revolution, the Russian Revolution, and the Chinese Civil War. The toll could even be more than 300,000,000. This is as though we had a nuclear war, but with its deaths and destruction spread over a century. Yet few know about this obscene slaughter.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Who does the speaker eventually imagine is at the door in Edgar Allan poe's ''the raven''
Luden [163]
The speaker eventually imagines his love is at the door in Edgar Allan Poe's "The Raven". 
The narrator is depressed because his love died, and he became quite mad, and started speaking to the bird, which made him realize he will never see Lenore again. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do u mean by impact ​
kvv77 [185]

Answer:

what are you asking

Explanation:

Are you asking for the meaning?

Meaning: have a strong effect on someone or something

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to this excerpt from "I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud" by William Wordsworth, what does the speaker do when he is in a re
    8·1 answer
  • What are the adjectives in the following sentence?
    7·1 answer
  • Rodney was raised on a farm in Utah and enjoys the taste of beef liver cooked with onions. Sarah was raised in New York City and
    7·1 answer
  • (PLEASE HELP) What is an extemporaneous topic? A. one that is given at the beginning of the debate B. one that is interesting be
    8·2 answers
  • Read the sentence. my friend Austen cut his finger with a particular pair of scissors. ouch!
    14·2 answers
  • Refer to You Should Meet Katherine Johnson for a complete version of this text.
    12·1 answer
  • T
    6·1 answer
  • HEY FRIES,. U CANHERE
    15·1 answer
  • Want brainliest?……..
    11·2 answers
  • Choose a product that you believe should be carefully monitored for the purpose of ensuring that marketers are not taking advant
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!