Answer:
I'm going between answer A and C, because usually a reduction of ones habitat anymore is due to human impact instead of temperature.
A would be a good answer because if more and more land was being lost to the gators, they would have to dwell in the water more.
C also would be a good answer because if something major was to happen to the gators, such as a sudden decrease in land and/or water habitat, they might not be able to handle the sudden change and die.
Explanation:
This is very true since every good deed has positive response.
Answer:
Explanation:
Subject-verb concord is when the subject of a sentence and the verb of a sentence agree. Simply, if the subject of the sentence is singular, the verb must be singular. If the subject of a sentence is plural, the verb must be plural.
Personally, I could never see myself as a leader, but if I were to be one during this time I would first understand both sides. The U.S government did the wrong thing when it came to this because they basically forced the Natives to leave their homelands. Like uhhhh, where’s the brain?? And to top it off, you have stinky men taking away most of the women and girls just to do the most awful things to them. I would talk to the Natives and say that we would have one side of the land while they had their half. I know it probably wouldn’t have been completely easy for I’m pretty sure the Natives wouldn’t see easily trust Americans. To be honest, no one was innocent during this time, but we know that this land was founded by Natives and I am not going to live to tell my children the whole “Christopher Columbus” thing. I hope my version of this idea helped lol
Answer:
John said that he loved that town
Explanation:
