I would say "a logical argument." The writer never mentions an expert opinion a statistic or a personal observation. The writer says its not worth the risk, making it logical.
A. "He realized at last how much poorer he was when he had left..."
<em>The Grapes of Wrath</em> is a novel based on capitalism and dehumanization by John Steinbeck. In the fifth chapter, the landowners tell the tenant farmers to leave the lands.
<h3>What is 'The Grapes of Wrath' about?</h3>
<em>The Grapes of Wrath</em> is a novel that shows the dehumanizing nature and the capitalistic approach of the owners to make money from the poor farmers. The Joads are the main character of the story which is the family of the poor farmer.
In the fifth chapter, the landowners and the bank asks the farmers to leave the land as there is no work and profit as the land was destroyed by the storms and drought. The manual cost of the farmer seemed more expensive to the owners.
Therefore, the owners ask option C. farmers to leave.
Learn more about 'The Grapes of Wrath' here:
brainly.com/question/4771383
#SPJ1
The place of sexuality in God's plane was that the Eva and Adan multiplied and subjugated the earth according Genesis the first book of the Bible.
This union of the first human been in the earth had a purpose and it was reproduction. But the man sin changed all the context.
One way that the expression of plan of God has been distorted for example: many people think the woman must have many children taking literally the statement of the Bible mentioned and dont matter if the childrens coming from different parents.
The sexuality designed by God is to recreation, increase the relation to be together and placer for the husband and wife. All the things invented for the men which to be out of this statement from God is a distortion.
