Answer:
the opportunity cost of producing a good is constant as more and more of that good is produced
Explanation:
In the case of the production possibilities frontier i.e. on the straight line presumes that the opportunity cost for generating the good should be the similar or constant when the more and more goods are generated or produced
So as per the given options, the above statement should be selected
And, the same is to be relevant
Answer: b. funds provided by borrowing.
c. funds provided by the sale of assets.
d. funds provided by issuing common or preferred stock.
Explanation:
The financial statement consists of two main components which are the balance sheet and the income statement. The balance sheet simoly shows the financial standing of a firm.
Of the options, those that can found in the balance sheet are:
b. funds provided by borrowing.
c. funds provided by the sale of assets.
d. funds provided by issuing common or preferred stock.
Answer:
Explanation:
Once out of Ginny sight, Alex faces a dilemma: Work very hard (put in all effort) or shirk (put in little effort). If he works hard, he'll sell enough water to generate $90 in earnings (not including his personal cost). If he shirks, he'll only generate $50 in earnings. After the end of the work, he'll split his earnings with Ginny and also get half of what she earns at her stand. In terms of Eric's total utility, it is worse for him to work hard. Close A If Alex works hard, Alex and Sunita together earn $270 ($180 + $90), of which Eric keeps $120. However, he loses $20 worth of utility by working hard. Therefore his net earnings is $100. If he shirks, Eric and Ginny together earn $270 ($200+ $70), of which Eric will keeps $120, while his personal cost is zero. Therefore Alex, individually, is better off when he shirks. A more better way of finding the solution to the problem is to note that from Eric's view, the amount of money he gets from Ginny's sales from the stand does not rely on his own sales.
"Suppose an economist test the theory that when the price of leather increases, fewer pairs of shoes ..."His observations invalidate the testability of his hypothesis since they go against the ceteris paribus premise. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is an economist?</h3>
Generally, an economist is simply defined as a professional in economics.
In conclusion, To illustrate, "let's say an economist investigates the hypothesis that higher leather costs lead to fewer shoe purchases." Since his findings contradict the ceteris paribus premise, his hypothesis cannot be tested.
Read more about economist
brainly.com/question/14299791
#SPJ1
Answer:
c. What is the impact of foreign competition on the U.S. auto industry?
Explanation:
Economic theory is divided into two broad areas: macroeconomics and microeconomics.
Macroeconomics discusses large economic aggregates, such as income, inflation, and employment variations. It is an approach that aims to discuss these factors and bring about improvements through economic policies.
In turn, microeconomics deals with micro factors, such as the behavior of consumers and companies, including in relation to competitive structures. Therefore, item (D) deals with microeconomics and not macroeconomics.