Which statement best explains why tension grew between European leaders over colonialism in Africa?

History

2 answers:

Lera25 [3.4K]3 years ago

5 0

D. Some were angered because other nations took over their colonies.

Lorico [155]3 years ago

3 0

The statement that best explains why tension grew between European leaders over colonialism in Africa is: "Some were angered because other nations took over their colonies." Option D is correct.

Between the 1870s and 1900, Africa coped to European imperialist aggression, diplomatic pressures, military invasions, and eventual conquest and colonization.

The European imperialist push into Africa was motivated by three main factors, economic, political, and social.

You might be interested in

PLEASE HELP ASAP NO LINKS

rosijanka [135]

Answer:

Concentrating the soldiers in one vast camp allowed the army to protect the countryside and be better able to resist a British attack, but it became costly when lack of supplies and hunger afflicted the inhabitants, and diseases like influenza and typhoid spread through the camp.

Explanation: Basically, the answer is C

7 0

2 years ago

A. The Chesapeake and New England regions had many differences in development, but they also had similarities.

Kisachek [45]

A thesis statement that would not be acceptable is B. The Chesapeake and New England colonies developed into two distinct societies based on their geography, reasons for founding, economic characteristics, and relationships with American Indians.

You did not include the prompt in the question but the above should be the best answer.

The New England Colonies and the Chesapeake colonies were different in that:

New England colonies were founded to escape religious persecution while the Chesapeake colonies were founded to make profit
New England colonies engaged in shipping, food production and lumbering whereas the Chesapeake colonies focused on tobacco.

Even though they were different in the above regard, their treatment of Native Americans was the same as they both started off with peaceful relations with the Natives which eventually deteriorated into war.

We can therefore conclude that even though they differed in several ways, they did not differ in Native treatment which would make option B wrong.

Find out more at brainly.com/question/18193023.

3 0

2 years ago

Did Americans support Filipino independence after Spain left the Philippines?

Rzqust [24]

Answer:

yes

I think he's because if u have a book if u look into it it'll tell u that the Filipino were helped by the american

6 0

3 years ago

According to Father Monserrate, what did Akbar look like?

Nimfa-mama [501]

Father Monserrate belongs to Portugal, who was invited by Akbar the great for his court in order to know the christian beliefs and studies. By invitation Father Monserrate (1536â€’1600) visited Akbar's court accompanied with two other priests, Father Rodolfo Acquaviva and Father Francisco Enriquez, on the first Jesuit mission. The necessity of christian study was that Akbar organised a new religion called Din i lakhi , in din i lakhi, akbar, collected all good morals in all religion . In india during pre - british period there is no christianity in India. So he invites Father Monserrate and his crew to India to collect the morals in Christianity. Akbar and his nobles belongs to Din i lakhi collects all the good morals from Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism etc,and compile the moral to add and flourished the new religion Din i lakhi. Hence from the Father Monserrate view Akbar look like a secular person.

4 0

3 years ago

What was most significant about Maryland’s Act of Toleration?

bekas [8.4K]

The Toleration Act of 1649 made it a crime to restrict the religious rights of Christians and was the first law supporting religious tolerance passed in the English colonies. hope that answered your question.

4 0

3 years ago