A: Free Trade. Laissez-Faire economic systems didn’t support the government’s place in the economy.
A: they freed the slaves who converted to Islam.
Use the process of elimination. It would be illegal in Muslim law to have children with slaves unless you married them, so C would not be an option.
Native Americans were not in Asia, so neither is D.
Muslims don't believe in forcing religions upon others, and it wouldn't make sense to force Christianity upon someone when you're not Christian, so B is not an option.
A is the answer.
The sharia law states:
Free Muslims, but note that:
Slaves who convert to Islam are not automatically freed
Children born to legally enslaved Muslims are also slaves
This means a slave who converted to Islam would be freed, but not automatically.
Although there were 2 houses in Parliament, the House of Lords was made up of Nobles and could veto any bill passed by the House of Commons. So, they could basically do whatever they wanted.
- Also, less than 5% of the people could vote
- Catholics and non-Anglican Protestants could not vote or serve in Parliament
I hope this helps :)
Answer:
to create a way for future generations to change the Constitution
Explanation:
The amendment process enables people to make changes as they believe necesary.
Explanation:
The Neolithic Revolution, also called the Agricultural Revolution, marked the transition in human history from small, nomadic bands of hunter-gatherers to larger, agricultural settlements and early civilization. ... Shortly after, Stone Age humans in other parts of the world also began to practice agriculture.