<span>Ancient Near Eastern ziggurats served as temples and civic centers.</span>
False, because when the animal injures itself it is not part of the DNA so when the animal reproduces the trait is not passed down. But the offspring can develop the same muscles or injuries as the animal did.
Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin
Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.
- Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
- Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
- Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
- Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
- The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.
Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.
Here are the chronological events:
1. <span>humans survived by hunting and gathering.
2. </span><span>the the neolithic revolution occurred,
3. </span><span>people could farm and store a surplus of food,
</span><span>4. advanced civilizations developed
</span>The advancaement in agricultural technology became the turning point in human history because it allow humans to modify food availability in order to sustain our survival, which lead to massive population growth and safety over period of time.
Slavery for sure. I believe the second one is economic differences between the North and the South.
