All categories

3 years ago

A commonality among the governments of the Kingdoms of Ghana, Mali, and Songhai is that they all ___.

History

2 answers:

Allisa [31]3 years ago

7 0

The answer is d, they were islamic

kiruha [24]3 years ago

4 0

The correct option is D

• The Empire of Ghana (750-1068) was located in what is now southeastern Mauritania and the western part of Mali, south of the Sahara, in the middle valley of the Senegal River. This empire grew rapidly due to the flow of Arab merchants, which quickly resulted in the empire converting to Islam.

• The Mali Empire was a medieval Mandinga state between 1235-1546, a town whose core was the Manden region, between the present cities of Bamako (Mali), and Siguiri (Guinea), in West Africa. It includes the history of the territory, the people and the rulers who would later form the Empire of Mali. It covers a historical period that goes approximately from the beginning of the tenth century to the middle of the thirteenth century. During the height of the empire the rulers and their subjects converted to Islam.

• The Songhai Empire, also known as the Songay Empire, was a state located in West Africa. From the beginning of the 15th century until the end of the 16th century, Songhai was one of the largest Islamic empires in history. This empire bore the name of its main ethnic group, the Songhai. Its capital was the city of Gao, where a Songhai state had existed since the 11th century. Its power base was located on the margin of the Niger River, in the current Niger and Burkina Faso.

You might be interested in

What 2 types of cases have concurrent jurisdiction?

77julia77 [94]

The two types of cases in the concurrent jurisdiction in civil cases and criminal cases.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Concurrent jurisdiction is defined as it allows the authority to hear the same cases in the one or more courts. In many cases a person can apply for the divorce he/she can get the sue in the lower district level court, family court or any one of the district court in the state.

In the united states federal courts and the state courts have concurrent jurisdiction to hear any types of the action. Such as bankruptcy, copyright, patent, maritime law cases.

3 0

3 years ago

If anyone can answer these in a couple paragraphs each, that would be very helpful.

kenny6666 [7]

The Mongols distrusted the Confucian scholar-officials in China because they believed these officials would lead China in a way they (Mongols) didn't want.

<h3>How was Genghis Khan compared to Kublai Khan?</h3>

Genghis Khan was more focused on military conquest as he expanded the Mongol empire. Kublai Khan on the other hand, was more focused social and economic facets of his empire.

Square script is a form of writing that involves using block letters. The Mongolians used it to write the Zanabazar square script.

Kamikaze was two typhoons that wrecked the fleets sent by Kublai Khan to invade Japan twice.

Sedentary People are those who don't go around much or engage in much movement. The Mongols went from being nomadic to sedentary.

The Golden Horde was the western Mongol empire and was one of the factions the Mongols split into when Genghis Khan died.

Find out more on the Golden Horde at brainly.com/question/1222831

#SPJ1

3 0

2 years ago

How was Harriet's life as a free woman different from her life as a slave? A. She had to work on a plantation. B. She was paid f

Naily [24]

B) she was paid for her work

Hope this helps :)

4 0

3 years ago

Based on what you have learned in this lesson, write two to three sentences describing one success and one failure of Clinton’s

cupoosta [38]

When the Genocide Convention was passed by the United Nations in 1948, the world said, “Never again.”

But the history of the twentieth century instead proved that “never again” became “again and again.” The promise the United Nations made was broken, as again and again, genocides and other forms of mass murder killed 170 million people, more than all the international wars of the twentieth century combined.

Why? Why are there still genocides? Why are there genocidal massacres going on right now in southern Sudan by the Sudanese government against Dinka, Nuer, and Nuba; in eastern Burma by the Burmese government against the Karen; in the Democratic Republic of the Congo by both government and rebel forces against Tutsis, Banyamulenge, Hutus, Hema, and Lendu? Why has ethnic and religious hatred again reached the boiling point in Israel and Palestine; Côte d’Ivoire, and Burundi?

There are two reasons why genocide is still committed in the world:

1. The world has not developed the international institutions needed to predict and prevent it.

2. The world’s leaders do not have the political will to stop it.

In order to prevent genocide, we must first understand it. We must study and compare genocides and develop a working theory about the genocidal process. There are many Centers for the Study of Genocide that are doing that vital work – in Australia, Brussels, Copenhagen, Jerusalem, Montreal, Memphis, Minneapolis, New Haven, Nottingham, and elsewhere.

But studying genocide is not enough. Our next task should be to create the international institutions and political will to prevent it. Four institutions are needed: centers for early warning, programs for conflict transformation, standing forces for rapid intervention, and international courts for effective punishment.

1. The U.N. Security Council and key governments need strong, independent Early Warning systems to predict where and when ethnic conflict and genocide are going to occur, and to present policy options on prevention and intervention. The Brahimi report made by the special commission on U.N. Peace-keeping makes just such a recommendation, and it should be implemented. Selected country desk officers and top officials of the U.N. system now hold monthly “Framework for Coordination” to discuss current crises, but inadequate staffing prevents long-range strategic planning. There is not a single person at the United Nations whose responsible for genocide early warning and prevention. Who do you call? Ghostbusters.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How does the president use the media to influence public opninion on policy?

ExtremeBDS [4]

Answer:

The president uses the media to influence public opinion on policy through speeches or opinions issued through mass communication channels, such as television, social networks, radio or newspapers. In this way, they express their different opinions seeking to attract support from the citizenry, which will ultimately endorse or not the measures that the president is going to take.

5 0

3 years ago