Answer:
can you wipe my butt please i did a little poopy
Explanation:
Individual liberty was safeguarded by the first 10 amendments, also referred to as "The Bill of Rights."
The Bill of Rights, an Act of Parliament passed in 1689, is regarded as a fundamental turning point in English constitutional law since it defines a number of fundamental civil rights and makes it clear who will succeed the monarchy. The Declaration of Right, which William III and Mary II were given by the Convention Parliament in February 1689 in order to invite them to become joint sovereigns of England, was restated in statutory form and obtained the Royal Assent on December 16, 1689.
To know more about bill of rights
brainly.com/question/493206
#SPJ4
#2 I think if not than #3
Answer:This misunderstanding is an example of: BYPASSING
Explanation:
Bypassing it's a kind of misunderstanding in which we miss the point that was meant by the message passed to us; so a sender says something and we miss the point of what he wanted us to grasp in that message. This mostly because different words means diffrent things to different people so what one understands to means something else it may means something totally different to the other person. These differences in how we understand the context is the reason why the receiver will miss what was meant by the message sent.
"summarize the most important information in each chapter" clearly the group members misunderstood that he meant that they needed to outline those concepts and bring them to the next group meeting , they probably just summarised it for their own understanding and maybe thought it would be discussed in group and then they will remember it then.
Frank tannenbaum said that the notion that the delinquent and nondelinquent are fundamentally two different people is misleading and referred to this as <u>"the dualistic fallacy".</u>
Dualistic Fallacy in criminological examinations refers to the suspicion that a populace has two totally unrelated subclasses, for example, criminals and noncriminals.
Criminology conflict theory proposes that the laws of society develop out of contention as opposed to out of accord. It holds that laws are made by the gathering that is in control, to control the individuals who are not in control. Struggle scholars propose, as do different scholars, that the individuals who carry out violations are not on a very basic level not the same as whatever is left of the populace. They consider the possibility that society might be obviously isolated into criminals and non-criminals a dualistic fallacy, or a misinformed thought.
