US history tries to make the white man look like the good guy and hide minority struggles.
According to the book, classical conditioning is a sort of learning in which a person learns to link two or more inputs and predict occurrences. To teach a youngster not to run into the street, it must be exposed to stimuli that are associated with not doing so.
Classical conditioning is a behavioral process in which biologically potent stimuli are paired with previously neutral stimuli. It also refers to the learning process resulting from this pairing, in which neutral stimuli usually elicit responses similar to those elicited by strong stimuli.
Classical conditioning differs from operant conditioning. In operant conditioning, the strength of voluntary behavior is modified through reinforcement or punishment. However, classical conditioning can influence operant conditioning in different ways. In particular, classically conditioned stimuli help reinforce operant responses.
Classical conditioning was first studied in detail by Ivan Pavlov. Pavlov conducted experiments on dogs and published the results in 1897. During a gastrointestinal study of Russian physiologists, Pavlov observed that the dogs he used as test subjects drooled when offered meat.
Learn more about Classical Conditioning here : brainly.com/question/7170975
#SPJ4
<span>Characteristics of collaborative strategies include: long-term focus, trust and openness, efforts to find mutually satisfying solutions, and pursuit of goals held jointly with others.
Collaborative means to work together. When different companies and people within an organization work together they are likely to build a strong brand within and produce products that consumers want a need to higher standards. Their overall goal is to achieve the best possible outcome based on how well the work and communicate with one another.
</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The actions that the Qin Dynasty would take against a person who wrote a book with their own opinions, about how they did not agree with the government were lethal.
Yes, during the Qin Dynasty in China, there was no freedom of speech or freedom of the press, or something similar. Quite the opposite.
Emperors during the Qin Dynasty were dictators and ruled an absolutists form of government. That is why they were the Emperors.
If someone expressed a critic or opposition against teh Emperor, he could be killed immediately. As simple as that. The Emperor was the absolute ruler and his word was the law.
Because of the earths rotation around the sun.
