Answer:
Oui, il peut y avoir un lien. Lorsque les gens jouent à des jeux vidéo, cela se répercute sur leur vie. Si les jeux sont violents, ils peuvent l'être.
Explanation:
Answer:
b. CS.
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the sight of dogs would be considered a conditioned stimulus. This term refers to a specific stimulus that when introduced causes a conditioned response. In this scenario the conditioned stimulus like stated before is the sight of the dogs which when introduced cause Jodie to exhibit a conditioned response which would be her crying.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The subject or subjects being observed in classic naturalistic observation may be unaware that they are being observed.
The correct option is (B).
<h3>What is naturalistic observation?</h3>
Naturalistic observation is a technique for seeing subjects in their natural setting.
The goal is to observe behavior in an unaltered natural environment.
Researchers may keep track of what they see by making notes or tallies.
Thus, the correct statement is (B) Maybe unaware that observation is being conducted.
Learn more about naturalistic observation, here:
brainly.com/question/8187021
Answer: To convey our message
Explanation:
Words are very important in communication, because through words the person at the other end of communication channel would able to know exactly what is on our mind to say.
To fully pass message across words are not enough, we would need to apply body signaling, body movement, tone variation for the audience to fully get our message.
Due to this reason communication is most times talking face to face with your audience than through messages or letters.
Answer:
B). Just as.
Explanation:
<u>Jerry M. Burger's replication to Stanley Milgram's one of the most acknowledged study and experiment on obedience propose that in comparison to people in 1970s, after fifty years of huge span of time people in 2006 were 'just as' likely to adhere to the authority' and ready to do anything asked for by the authority as they were previously.</u> His claims replicate Milgram's theory by saying that the factors explained by him are still operative. He even duplicated his proposition regarding the distinct rates of obedience among men and women. Therefore, <u>option B</u> becomes the correct answer to this question.