Napoleon Bonaparte had a contradictory character. He had an unusual personality. The writer Germaine de Staël described him as being ‘neither good nor violent, neither gentle nor cruel’, which denotes that he was <em>neutral</em>, a<em> calm </em>and <em>calculated/prudent </em>person. he was considered<em> unique </em>and <em>very special </em>for the actions he took and the thinking he put into taking decisions. By the French writer Stendhal, he was seen as <em>very </em><span><em>ambitious</em> (''endowed with amazing abilities and a dangerous ambition’'). He was very <em>firm</em> when it was about facing his <span>opponents. Even more, he could get even mad when his passions had to face disputes. He was a very difficult person, but that made him more <em>powerful </em>than the others. Also, it is said that ''his diversity (<em>diverse</em>) made him <em>fascinating''</em>. He was hostile to his older brother. He had a military, legislative and <span>diplomatic talent. |He was<em> popular</em>, but his more of defects were: picky (<span>squeamish), selfish, egocentric.</span></span></span></span>
Well many things. Classical civilization had a primitive government with laws, most were river valley civilizations (<span>Mesopotamia/Sumer, and Harrappa/Mojeno-daro)</span>
I believe the answer is democracy ^^
Las personas son inútiles pero por lo menos estas tu para demostrarlo :)
Explanation:
Perdón, mañana tengo un examen de teatro y estoy practicando :v
Answer:
c) Ran some institutions, but allowed for private ownership.
Explanation:
Stalin was a totalitarian, so free speech was not allowed, and the economy was tightly controlled by Soviet Law as a communist country. There were three types of property under the Soviets, private, public, and collective.
