1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LekaFEV [45]
3 years ago
15

How did the spread of agriculture affect trade? (agricultural revolution) PLS HURRY AND HELP ME!

History
2 answers:
Airida [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

the farmers had discovered which grains have the best yields and selected these for planting. They produced more food than they needed and were able to feed non-farmers such as craft workers and traders.

Explanation:

...

Dovator [93]3 years ago
3 0
The farmers produced more food than needed and were able to feed people like the craft workers and traders
You might be interested in
Describe the old US policy toward Indians
Savatey [412]

Answer:

Explanation:

What were the policies of the United States towards the Indians?

For most of the middle part of the nineteenth century, the U.S. government pursued a policy known as “allotment and assimilation.” Pursuant to treaties that were often forced upon tribes, common reservation land was allotted to individual families.

3 0
2 years ago
ANOTHER 50 POINTS BECAUSE I JUST GOT EXPERT AFTER A WEEK AND A HALF OR JOINING BRAINLY
kolezko [41]
Thank you a lot for the free points! Make sure to contact me if you need any help!
~pluto100
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following inspired U.S. interest in Iraq after World War II, and the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait?
Inessa05 [86]
I think it is oil reserves
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of these methods of direct democracy: Initiative, Referendum, and Recall?
Marina86 [1]
  • In the United States, where there is no direct democracy at the federal level, more than half of the states (and many municipalities) allow citizens to vote on initiatives, and the vast majority of states have mechanisms to promote initiatives or referendums. There are also community meetings (town meetings) and various institutions at the municipal level where citizens can interact with those responsible for administration in decision-making. The disadvantages of the initiatives is that any citizen could present it at any time and it should be analyzed and taken into account, which could take a long time.
  • Referendums are elections in which voters do not elect representatives but participate in taking direct participation on some important issue of the country. As advantages, it is highlighted that the Referendum can be used to solve problems of a political nature, or the improvement of the governmental image, when it is too deteriorated in front of the popular collective. Another aspect that touches a possible disadvantage, has to do with the circumstance that can be used as a strategy or political weapon to satisfy political interests or ambitions of power. It has also been argued that this figure has a meaning called "zero sum", that is, where the majority wins everything and the minority loses everything, originating a tyranny of majorities, that have answered one or several questions about a specific issue and that in the case at hand, has to do with the end of the armed conflict, questions that are closed and must be answered with the yes or no.
  • Revocation of mandate, revocation of mandate or recall referendum (in English, recall election), is a procedure by which citizens can cease their public office to an elected official, before the end of their respective period, by direct vote or by collection of signatures, depending on the geographic or population dimensions. Those who propose a revocation mechanism argue that these have a disciplinary effect on elected officials, in which elected representatives will make fewer unpopular decisions if this may cause them to be more likely to be subject to a recall campaign. However, the same argument is also used against the recall: opponents argue that the recall completely undermines representative government as it causes elected officials fear to make unpopular but necessary decisions. Another argument in favor of direct democracy is that it provides voters with a continuous opportunity to make a democratic decision about who governs them, since they not only have the opportunity to elect the people who represent them every two to six years, but also to maintain a degree of control over the decision of its duration in the position. However, its opponents maintain that the mechanism of revocation could be used irresponsibly, and that this could be used by the political parties as a political weapon against the rival of the holders. The assertion that the revocation mechanism is being used as a political instrument was made by many Democrats against activists of Republican parties in connection with the recall in California in 2003.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1940, the US was still
lara31 [8.8K]

Answer: here's my answer

Explanation:Twenty years after World War I ended, 70% of Americans polled believed that American participation in the war had been a mistake. The United States was only involved in the final nineteen months of the bloody conflict, between April 1917 and November 1918, but the war (and the influenza epidemic that immediately followed) resulted in the deaths of more than 116,000 American soldiers.

After the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, President Woodrow Wilson lobbied extensively for US support for the League of Nations, believing that an international representative body would prevent future wars. The US Senate, however, refused to approve participation in the League. The United States never joined the League of Nations, nor ratified the Treaty of Versailles.

In the 1920s, the US government took measures to reduce the threat of foreign conflict. The US signed treaties limiting naval construction, and signed the Kellogg-Briand Peace Pact, outlawing aggressive war. The United States also sought to lessen foreign influence by reducing immigration. The Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and the Johnson-Reed Act of 1924 limited overall immigration and set country-specific quotas, privileging immigrants from northern and western Europe. These laws, which reflected a widespread belief in eugenics and deeply held antisemitic prejudices, marked the end of a period of mass immigration to the United States. The number of arrivals immediately fell to less than 20% of the pre-World War I totals.

Neutrality

International unrest in the 1930s, including Japan’s occupation of Manchuria, Italy’s invasion of Ethiopia, Nazi Germany’s remilitarization and territorial seizures, and the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War, threatened US isolationism. In response to these conflicts, the US Congress passed a series of Neutrality Acts, designed to prevent American involvement in these conflicts. Longstanding diplomatic practice held that countries unwilling to become involved in a conflict had to maintain strict neutrality; even economic sanctions, or selling arms to one belligerent but not the other, could be considered acts of war. The Neutrality Acts, therefore, defined the terms of American neutrality to the world.

The Neutrality Act of 1935 prohibited exporting arms and ammunition to any foreign nation at war. In 1937, a new neutrality act prohibited Americans from traveling on ships owned by any belligerent nation, and declared that American-owned ships could not carry any arms intended for war zones. At Roosevelt’s request, however, the Neutrality Act of 1937 removed impartiality, allowing the President to distinguish among nations at war when enforcing neutrality. Favored nations could purchase non-military products in the United States, provided they paid with cash and transported the goods on their own ships, an arrangement known as “cash and carry.”

Portrait of Secretary of State Cordell Hull signing the president's Neutrality Proclamation.

Cordell Hull signs neutrality proclamation

Portrait of Secretary of State Cordell Hull signing President Franklin D. Roosevelt's neutrality proclamation. September 5, 1939.

National Archives and Records Administration, College Park, MD

View Archival Details

On September 1, 1939, Germany invaded Poland, leading Great Britain and France to declare war on Germany. Americans who were polled immediately after the war began overwhelmingly hoped for the defeat of Germany, but more than ninety percent opposed getting involved in the war. A majority did not want to join the fight even if Nazi Germany defeated Great Britain and France.

In November 1939, two months after the beginning of World War II, Congress passed the Neutrality Act of 1939, which lifted the 1935 arms embargo and placed all sales to belligerent nations on a “cash and carry” basis.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The first step in adding an amendment to the Constitution is the amendment being A.sent to the state legislatures by the preside
    11·2 answers
  • How did president roosevelt respond to
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HURRY WHAT IS THIS ANSWER???? My mom is MAD bc this is overdue
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true regarding African American participation in the civil war
    15·2 answers
  • in which case did the Supreme Court rule the policy must inform criminal suspects of their illegal right up under arrest​
    11·1 answer
  • What group ended the Umayyad Empire
    14·2 answers
  • List the distinguished leaders from the first and second continental congress.
    13·1 answer
  • Read the passage below and answer the question that follows:
    12·1 answer
  • What does this cartoon suggest about the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918?
    10·1 answer
  • 4. Which of the following was an effect of Lincoln's issuing of the Emancipation Proclamation? (1 point)
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!