C- The National Rifle Association
Answer: Misinformation effect
Explanation:
Misinformation effect is the concept in which episodic memory recollection becomes less precise due to post event information. Original event memory gets disturbed through post event memory tat leads to creation of incorrect memories or false memories.
According to question,misinformation effect is depicted as fictitious information created after car accident event is filmed.As smashing word is creating a information of glass breaking in accident whereas people who do not hear smashing has no such false scenario.
Answer:
Invasion of privacy.
Explanation:
A tort in Civil law is wrong doing by a person against another person, that can lead to the wrong-doer being held legally liable for his or her actions.
The tort of "Invasion of privacy" occurs when the actions of a person or organization intrudes into someone's personal life without permission.
Appropriation is a form of invasion of privacy, where a person or organization, without permission, uses another person's picture, name or likeness to make commercial gains.
When this happens, the party responsible is liable to pay damages to the wronged individual.
Answer:
The species was most likely not found in its natural environment and died because of its inability to adapt to the new environment. Animal species have specific characteristics in their behavior and physical appearance that makes them thrive in a particular climate. Polar bears have white fur, thick coats, and a large structure to support themselves and effectively hunt in the Arctic. When placed in a jungle environment, for example, these characteristics are not useful, and would be a burden to them. This is why when a prehistoric animal if found in a different place, it is because it wandered there (out of need or out of confusion) and couldn't adapt.
Answer:
b. The defendant's conduct was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's emotional distress
Explanation:
The act must be intentional, offensive and it could not possibly be considered as a mistake or joke which led to emotional distress in the plaintiff. That is, the emotional distress experienced by the plaintiff must be linked to the conducts/actions of the defendant,
