Based on your short reading, what was one way japanese americans resisted internment

2 answers:

8 0

Japanese Americans who protested the loss of their constitutional rights in World War II by refusing to fight for their country until the government freed them and their families from wartime internment camps .

larisa86 [58]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Koshiyama, 74, of San Jose, is one of 315 Japanese Americans who challenged the loss of their established rights in World War II by declining to battle for their nation until the point that the administration liberated them and their families from wartime internment camps.

The camps, viewed as a fundamental piece of the Japanese American experience, have since quite a while ago evoked pictures of unprotesting internees - surrendered, alarmed and severe however agreeable. However, the draft resisters, alongside other people who communicated their complaints in various ways, reflect accounts of challenge and obstruction in the camps - stories that were the beginning of profound splits that still partition Japanese Americans today.

You might be interested in

Was China's one-child policy good for China and its people? Why or why not?

USPshnik [31]

yes because if the population is too high, maybe there won't be enough resources for everyone.

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Read the following excerpt from Martin Luther's 95 Theses. Then answer the following question:

crimeas [40]

Which of the following best summarizes Martin Luther's ideas in points 4 through 6?

Best Answer is : Christians seek ultimate remittance from God, rather than the Pope.

3 0

3 years ago

Analyze the excerpt below from Woodrow Wilson, War Message to Congress (1917). Let us be very clear, and make very clear to all

morpeh [17]

Answer:

**in the existence of autocratic governments backed by an organized force that is totally controlled by their will, not by the will of their people.**

Explanation:

An autocratic government has an illegitimate power base, since it is not elected by the power of the people as a linclon indication if it is not taken by force and held in terror against the people, the autocratic government, inhibits the basic human rights of man and does not allow the freedoms of people's power to be expensed or given.

3 0

4 years ago

A small settlement formed along the Indus River following the Neolithic Revolution. As the settlement grew, people began to spec

pochemuha

I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option C. The other development that the settlement need to be considered a civilization would be a complex social institutions. A civilization is any complex society characterized by urban development, social stratification, symbolic communication forms, and a perceived separation from and domination over the natural environment by a cultural elite.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In your opinion, is taking the law into one's own hands

Svet_ta [14]

The simple answer to your complex question is NO. This is assuming that you live in a country where there are good laws (remember that history is full of bad governments that implemented bad laws) and that law enforcement is effective. Simplisticly, you should only ask yourself this question when your or your families life is being threatened and law enforcement is not around. Your response must still be within the constraints of your laws or you will find yourself in hot water. I'm not even going to try to discuss the ethics and morals that can apply as the situation can vary immensely. Keep it simple - don't operate outside the law, rather fight against unjust laws.

4 0

3 years ago