Answer:
The following sets of percentages would be used to calculate the correct number of equivalent units in the ending work-in-process inventory:
D. Materials, 100%; conversion cost, 60%.
Explanation:
<em>The above is actually the best option which would be used to calculate the correct number of equivalent units in the ending work-in-process inventory.</em>
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The Securities Act of 1933 requires the registration of all the securities issued and sold ob public markets. This act had some exemptions:
- private offerings (if the securities were offered to a certain group of persons and/or institutions)
- offerings of a limited size: a very small issuance would be excluded, but remember that $5 million of 1933 are equivalent to more than $98 million today (average annual inflation of 3.48%)
- securities issued by government entities
- securities issued on intrastate offerings (only traded within a given state)
Answer:
b. 30%
Explanation:
The computation of the percentage increased in sales from the previous year to the current year is shown below:
= (Current year Sale - Preceding year Sale) ÷ (Preceding year Sale
)
= ($325,000 - $250,000) ÷ ($250,000)
= ($75,000) ÷ ($250,000)
= 30%
Hence, the correct option is b. 30%
We simply applied the above formula to determine the percentage increased in sales
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The working capital is the difference between the current assets that is used in daily operations e g cash to current liabilities that are to be met in daily operations e g suppliers credit.
It's better kept at ratio 2:1 for the Company to continuously meets his obligations in order to ensure perpetuity.
Answer: 1. Charities
2. Government action the only viable solution
Explanation:
Externalities are the resultant additional effects that are experienced by others as a result of actions by an economic agent who does not bear the extra aformentioned cost or benefit that their actions bring about.
1. Private Solutions to Externalities include any solution independent of the government.
The above Private Solution is Charities because it was a Non-profit Environmental Organization that dealt with the lobbying for the reduction to be acted upon by state agents. These types of organisations are usually Charities.
2. If it is shown that the potential gains are viewed to be quite high as in this case then negotiating with the polluters might not work. In this case Government Intervention is needed to force the polluters to adhere to rules and regulations.
