Answer:
$652,858
Explanation:
Predetermined overhead rate = Budgeted Overheads ÷ Budgeted Activity
= $717,474 ÷ 364,200
= $1.97 per direct labor hour
Allocated overheads = Predetermined overhead rate x Actual Activity
= $1.97 x 331,400 direct labor hours
= $652,858
therefore,
The overhead allocated for May is $652,858.
Answer:
9.6845%
Explanation:
Market risk premium = Market return - Risk free rate
7.3 = 11.2 - Risk free rate
Risk free rate = 3.9%
(1) Use CAPM:
Cost of equity = Risk free rate + Beta × Market risk premium
= 3.9% + 1.06(7.3)
= 11.638%
(2) Use DDM
:
Stock price = [Latest dividend × (1 + dividend growth rate)] ÷ (Cost of equity-dividend growth rate)
$17 = [0.92 (1 + 0.022)] ÷ (Cost of equity - 0.022)
Cost of equity = 7.731%
Cost of equity = average value from using DDM and CAPM
Cost of equity = 0.5 (7.731 + 11.638)
= 9.6845%
Answer:
core competency
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question in regards to the situation at hand it can be said that the iPad was a core competency for Apple. This term refers to the use of a company's resources and skills to create something in order to set it apart and give the company a competitive advantage in a market. Which is exactly what the iPad did for Apple.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
$24.21
Explanation:
Direct materials $8.20
Direct labor 8.30
Variable manufacturing overhead 1.2
Fixed manufacturing overhead (70% × $4.30 is avoidable) = 3.01
8.2 + 8.3 + 1.2 + 3.01 = 20.71
Relevant manufacturing cost = $20.71
$7.00 per unit ÷ 4 minutes per unit = $1.75 per minute
$1.75 per minute × 2 minutes = $3.5
$20.71 + $3.5
= $24.21
Answer:
The correct answer is c. Prospect theory.
Explanation:
Prospective theory belongs to behavioral economics and stands out as an alternative model to the expected utility theory, since the validity of the rational agent's neoclassical assumption is questioned. This theory was developed by Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman and his collaborator Amos Tversky in his »Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk” (1979). They used the results obtained from both his own empirical observations, as of several experiments.
Individuals set preferences based on a specific situation and circumstances, rather than in absolute terms. This means that depending on their initial situation, agents will act in one way or another. One of the results of this reasoning leads to behavioral asymmetries between situations of possible losses or gains. Individuals, for example, are generally more risk averse than profit lovers. An endowment effect is also derived from this analysis, since the compensation required by someone to dispose of a good is greater than what they would be willing to pay to acquire it.
