1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lana71 [14]
2 years ago
10

What was the Land Ordinance of 1787's view towards Native Americans?

History
2 answers:
crimeas [40]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

It forbid Native American lands from being taking from them without their consent.

Explanation:

The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 was an act enacted by the Confederation's Congress to provide for the settlement and political incorporation of the lands the U.S had acquired during the American Revolutionary War: the territory of the North-West of the River Ohio. The act aimed to do this incorporation in a peaceful and orderly way, and it forbade Native American lands from being taken from them without their consent, as outlined in Article III:

<em>The utmost good faith shall always be observed towards the </em><em>Indians</em><em>; </em><em>their lands and property shall never be taken from them without their consent;</em><em> and, in their property, rights, and liberty, they shall never be invaded or disturbed, unless in just and lawful wars authorized by Congress; but laws founded in justice and humanity, shall from time to time be made for preventing wrongs being done to them, and for preserving peace and friendship with them.</em>

natulia [17]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It forbid Native American lands from being taking from them without their consent.

You might be interested in
What did Dutch trading companies promise to settlers in New Netherland?
3241004551 [841]
They offered religious freedom hope this halps
4 0
2 years ago
What are the primary colors in the usa?
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

Red white and blue because this are the staple colors of the flag

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The 1950 Supreme Court decision to ban “separate but equal” law schools in Texas
aliya0001 [1]

The case you describe is:  SWEATT v. PAINTER


Details:

The case of <em>Sweatt v. Painter (</em>1950), challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine regarding racial segregated schooling which had been asserted by an earlier case, <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1896).

Heman Marion Sweatt was a black man who was not allowed admission into  the School of Law of the University of Texas.  Theophilus Painter was the president of the University of Texas at the time.  So that's where the names in the lawsuit came from.

In the case, which made its way to the US Supreme Court, the ultimate decision was that forcing Mr. Sweatt to attend law school elsewhere or in a segregated program at the University of Texas failed to meet the "separate but equal" standard, because other options such as those would have  lesser facilities, and he would be excluded from interaction with future lawyers who were attending the state university's main law school, available only to white students.  The school experience would need to be truly equal in order for the "separate but equal" policy to be valid.

In 1954, another Supreme Court decision went even further. <em>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka </em>extended civil liberties to all Americans in regard to access to all levels of education.  The <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>case had said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality.  In <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional.  After the Brown v. Board of Education decision, there was a struggle to get states to implement the new policy of desegregated schools, but eventually they were compelled to do so.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was the central issue of the presidential election of
posledela
This one was A. Slavery because I have answered this question before im lik 99% sure
7 0
3 years ago
Two atomic bombs were dropped on this nation, thus ending world war 11.
Novosadov [1.4K]
Japan, the bomb was dropped at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Do you agree or disagree with american imperialism?
    9·1 answer
  • Which term BEST describes the American political party system?
    9·1 answer
  • Why was Mussolini allowed to come to power
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is best classified as an exclusive power of the federal government
    13·2 answers
  • What was the nature of the compromise urged by Booker T.
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the hitler hate jews
    7·2 answers
  • how did the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki illustrate the idea that World War ll was "total war"
    14·1 answer
  • What does the fifth amendment state?
    5·1 answer
  • Reflection
    9·1 answer
  • Select all the correct answers. which three negative effects did reagan's deregulation of programming have on children?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!