Efficacy and Safety of Combination Antiplatelet Therapies in Patients With Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Background and purpose: An optimal strategy for management of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) has not yet been established.
<h3>What is
Antiplatelet Therapies?</h3>
A class of medications known as antiplatelets prevents blood cells, or platelets, from clumping together and producing a blood clot.
Platelets are transported to the site of an injury whenever it occurs in your body, where they cluster together to create a blood clot. Your body's bleeding is stopped by this. This is advantageous if you have a wound or cut. But occasionally, in a blood artery that is damaged, swollen (inflamed), or that has plaque buildup, platelets will congregate (atherosclerosis). When this occurs, the platelets may lead to the formation of a blood clot inside the vessel. Placing stents, artificial heart valves, and other devices inside the heart might also result in blood clots from platelets.
To learn more about Antiplatelet Therapies from the given link:
brainly.com/question/28086164
#SPJ4
In this given situation, we should stand behind him and administer abdominal thrusts.
<h3>Which part of the body should abdominal thrusts be administered?</h3>
Place the fist's thumb side against the person's stomach, just above the belly button and below the ribs. The muscle of the diaphragm can be felt. With the other hand over the fist, make a quick, powerful upward thrust into this muscle. Keep performing abdominal thrusts until the thing exits.
In order to remove things from the throat, the Heimlich maneuver employs abdominal thrusts. The diaphragm is a muscle that lies beneath the lungs. To assist the lungs in exhaling air, this muscle contracts. The Heimlich maneuver works by creating an artificial cough.
Learn more about abdominal thrusts here:
brainly.com/question/25033154
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer would be 'b'
Explanation:
An ethical dilemma or ethical paradox is a decision-making problem between two possible moral imperatives, neither of which is unambiguously acceptable or preferable. The complexity arises out of the situational conflict in which obeying would result in transgressing another
