Lol why did the British call
Generally, the best way to proceed when you have concerns about the behavior of a colleague is to deal directly with the colleague, unless doing so would compromise a client's confidentiality.
If they continue doing such behavior, we can make it known to those in charge of company ethics. We can provide the evidence of the violations.
If we are unsure whether their behavior is unethical or not, it is better that we may consult with people who are charged with maintenance of ethical standard the concerns you have.
Also direct complain would not help because we may might have misinterpreted the actions of the colleague. So it is better to watch out and deal directly.
To learn more about behavior here
brainly.com/question/8871012
#SPJ4
I think it is Defensiveness
Answer
The Code of Hammurabi were enacted in Babylonia circa 1792 to 1750 B.C.E. It is one of the most ancient legal codes written in human history. All Babylonian citizens ought to abide to this set of rules, including the king. Therefore, it limited the king's power and prevented him to impose his will, it was against the law.
Explanation
The Code of Hammurabi is was King Hammurabi’s attempt to set a clear set of rules to all people living in a complex, large and ever-growing empire. The code intended to establish clear rules that govern people behaviour, what was considered unlawful and the punishment a citizen would expect when breaking the law. For instance, it forbidden slander, perjury, fraud, theft and adultery. It also created a legal framework for trade, slavery, divorce, liability and the relationship between workers and landowners.
The code was not necessarily fair. It was especially harsh on lower classes and women, making the laws unequal. For instance, the punishments received by higher classes when they had a dispute were far lenient than the ones imposed on lower classes.
However, and in spite this unfairness, the code limited the capacity of a single ruler to impose his/her own will over other people. The clear set of rules prevented the king from using subjective appraisals to judge singular cases. All people would measure with the same rules, and these could not change from situation to situation.
Considering the available options, the events that could be a threat to a state’s sovereignty at the national scale while holding a region together at the global scale is "<u>Admittance into a supranational organization such as the European Union."</u>
<h3>What is a Supranational Organization?</h3>
A Supranational organization is a type of organization in which the members, usually the countries, surrender their power and autonomy on specific issues, precisely internal matters concerning all the members, to the organization's rulings.
The advantage of being a member of a Supranational organization is that it keeps countries together and formidable on a world scale.
For example, the European Union, where all the members vote to make decisions on issues concerning all the organization members.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option C. "<u>Admittance into a supranational organization such as the European Union."</u>
Learn more about European Union here: brainly.com/question/13929900
