Answer:
Every one has a district past and hence needs to be appraised.
Explanation:
- As said from geographic terms the past is the key to the present and change is fundamental to the environment so the past experiences of a person are shaped by his or her beliefs, moral values and the custom of life, he can develop new and improved ways to work, and motivation is something that comes from within the person and is based on his willpower to do so.
- Life from my perspective is something that is meant to be valued and respected not be taken for granted and that overcoming my fears and being able to meet the daily expectation or the demands of life are important characteristics that motivate me the most.
- To be able to learn something new every day form the physical world is the grated gift that man has got and his intellect is an interplay of that.
- <u>The feeling that 24 hours is the only thing we have left and work to achieve your goals in life is what makes me motivated and hence this I view is something that makes you want to go further and keep on going till the target is reached.</u>
This question is incomplete because the options are missing, here is the complete question:
In North Florida, there are concerns that groundwater withdrawals to meet regional water use demands are negatively affecting the volume of water available for natural spring systems, considered a unique and significant regional environmental resource. This complex situation creates a significant ethical dilemma. Common ethical theories were discussed in the textbook readings and outlined in the lectures. Select the pair of theories that would best apply to this ethical dilemma:
Utilitarianism approach and common good approach
Utilitarianism approach and rights approach
Fairness/justice approach and virtue approach
Rights approach and virtue approach
The correct answer is the Utilitarism approach and common good approach
Explanation:
Both utilitarianism and the common good approach focus on the ethical aspects of actions. In the case of the first approach, this emphasizes the consequences of an action by analyzing the benefits or harm related to this. This approach is effective in this ethical dilemma because it is necessary to consider both the benefits for humans that will obtain fresh water and the harm in the natural ecosystem.
On the other hand, the common good approach states any individual good including access to water is linked to the general good. In the ethical dilemma presented this implies the use of water for human society is not ethical except if it leads to a general good, which includes access to water for other species living in natural ecosystems. According to this, these two approaches or theories are the most appropriate for this dilemma.
Quietly but steadily Central Asia’s basic human and physical infrastructure – the roads, power plants, hospitals and schools and the last generation of Soviet-trained specialists who have kept this all running – is disappearing. The equipment is wearing out, the personnel retiring or dying. Post-independence regimes made little effort to maintain or replace either, and funds allocated for this purpose have largely been eaten up by corruption. This collapse has already sparked protests and contributed to the overthrow of a government.
The major obstacles to political reform and structural diversification in the five Central Asian economies are internal and external geopolitical factors and deeply embedded institutional weaknesses within each country, particularly in areas where economic management interacts with authoritarian political systems and imperfect legal institutions.
<span>the Roman Senators were elected every six years.
hope this helped :)
alisa202</span>
