Answer:
The question references the poem about the six blind men.
The first said after touching the sides said it is smooth and solid like a wall and that it must be very powerful.
The second: After touching the trunk stated that the elephant was like a large snake
The third: after touching its tusk said the elephant is sharp like a spear
The fourth: Liken the elephant to a large cow after touching its legs
The fifth: stated that it is like a huge fan or a flying carpet
The sixth said that the elephant was a piece of rope after touching its tail.
When viewed individually, they all got it wrong. But when all their answers are put together, it adequately, albeit eccentrically, describes the elephant.
Cheers
Two types of argument would be a non-emergency argument meaning it does not really count, it will be over later. And the seccond argument would be a emergency argument meaning it would actually count towards something. The emergency argument is more important
Answer: I do not see the details but my guess would be because the woman is antisocial.
Hope this helps! :)
Explanation:
They prompt skepticism about traditional marital roles in her writing.
