1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Julli [10]
4 years ago
10

This 1974 Supreme Court case held that executive privilege may not be invoked to deny the courts access to evidence needed in a

criminal proceeding.
History
2 answers:
lbvjy [14]4 years ago
8 0
United States v. Nixon
Pani-rosa [81]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The 1974 Supreme Court case that held that executive privilege may not be invoked to deny the courts access to evidence needed in a criminal proceeding was United States v. Nixon.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Nixon of 1974 is a landmark decision on the limits of the powers of the President of the United States in relation to the other branches of government and to the domestic information system.

As part of the Watergate affair, President Nixon was asked by the Special Investigator and later by Congress to publish tapes recorded in the White House, which could have contributed to the investigation of the affair. Nixon, however, refused to release the tapes and instead offered copies of some of the recordings. The Judge of the District Court for Washington DC insisted on the release of the tapes, and the dispute eventually came before the Supreme Court of the United States.

The Supreme Court had to decide whether the legislature or the judiciary had the right to demand that the President of the United States, and thus the executive, publish it, or whether, as Nixon argued, this would violate the principle of separation of powers.

In its unanimous decision, the Supreme Court first made it clear that it had the competence to determine to what extent the United States Constitution restricts the powers of the President, and that the Constitution provides that laws may be enforced against the President. With regard to the executive power of the President, it stated that, in any case, it would not be given priority when it comes to the publication of evidence that is demonstrably relevant in criminal proceedings. So the tapes had to be released.

You might be interested in
Helps me pls! Brainliest and 5 points!
Alona [7]

Answer:

using savings stampsemploying new technologies

3 0
3 years ago
Opium was introduced in China by the<br> British<br> Japanese<br> Italians<br> French
zhuklara [117]

Answer: Turkish

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The first 10 amendments to the US Constitution are also known as the
Daniel [21]

Answer:

The Bill of Rights is the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution. It spells out Americans' rights in relation to their government. It guarantees civil rights and liberties to the individual—like freedom of speech, press, and religion.

3 0
3 years ago
A session is a period of time each year when members of congress ________.
Gennadij [26K]

A session is a period of time each year when members of congress “meet to discuss laws” so option 3) is the correct one.

The United States congress has two sessions within a two-year term, one per year. During these sessions, the congress meets to debate on passing new laws and acts. Any member of the congress can introduce a bill to be discussed later in the sessions.  


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How should the Native Americans have handled the arrival of the Spanish?
bulgar [2K]

Answer:

Natives were subjects of the Spanish crown, and to treat them as less than human violated the laws of God, nature, and Spain. He told King Ferdinand that in 1515 scores of natives were being slaughtered by avaricious conquistadors without having been converted. They should have never slaughtered any other human an treated them as unhuman. Spanish colonizers attempted to integrate Native Americans into Spanish culture by marrying them and converting them to Catholicism. If I were in this situation, I would be severly frightened for my life. This is an extreme situation and should have never been handled the way it had been.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following could be considered a structural way to limit government
    6·1 answer
  • Match the following.
    15·1 answer
  • The "half-way covenant" was created in the mid-1700s in order to A) increase the population of the southern colonies. B) attract
    13·2 answers
  • Do you think first nation supported the railway?why or why not
    12·2 answers
  • The reasons why the first english settles in America
    14·1 answer
  • I NEED THE CORRECT ANSWER TO THIS ASAP FOR A TEST!!! What principle did Marbury v. Madison create as a precedent that would be f
    12·1 answer
  • The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution expanded civil rights by
    10·1 answer
  • How did the First Great Awakening impact women?
    13·1 answer
  • What kind of home did settlers in the Alabama frontier live in?
    7·1 answer
  • What was one major effect of industrialization on American society?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!