1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Julli [10]
3 years ago
10

This 1974 Supreme Court case held that executive privilege may not be invoked to deny the courts access to evidence needed in a

criminal proceeding.
History
2 answers:
lbvjy [14]3 years ago
8 0
United States v. Nixon
Pani-rosa [81]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The 1974 Supreme Court case that held that executive privilege may not be invoked to deny the courts access to evidence needed in a criminal proceeding was United States v. Nixon.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Nixon of 1974 is a landmark decision on the limits of the powers of the President of the United States in relation to the other branches of government and to the domestic information system.

As part of the Watergate affair, President Nixon was asked by the Special Investigator and later by Congress to publish tapes recorded in the White House, which could have contributed to the investigation of the affair. Nixon, however, refused to release the tapes and instead offered copies of some of the recordings. The Judge of the District Court for Washington DC insisted on the release of the tapes, and the dispute eventually came before the Supreme Court of the United States.

The Supreme Court had to decide whether the legislature or the judiciary had the right to demand that the President of the United States, and thus the executive, publish it, or whether, as Nixon argued, this would violate the principle of separation of powers.

In its unanimous decision, the Supreme Court first made it clear that it had the competence to determine to what extent the United States Constitution restricts the powers of the President, and that the Constitution provides that laws may be enforced against the President. With regard to the executive power of the President, it stated that, in any case, it would not be given priority when it comes to the publication of evidence that is demonstrably relevant in criminal proceedings. So the tapes had to be released.

You might be interested in
5. What is "sensible" beauty and ethical beauty? How do the two differ? How are they similar?
svlad2 [7]
Sensible beauty pertains to the beauty of the person in their physical appearance while ethical beauty pertains to the beauty of the person's character or inner character where it does not rely on the outer image. The two are different in how they define beauty and how they are applied, the only thing that makes them similar is their similarities of trying to define what beauty means.
7 0
3 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST AND GIVE 50 POINTS BUT PLEASE GIVE A GOOD ANSER THANK YOU I AM HAVING A REALLY HARD TIME WILL HISTORY
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

(3) the woman is native american and the settlers are kicking her out of her home

this is as much as i can do hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is lacerating?Help??????
VladimirAG [237]

Answer:

lacerating: severely critical or hurtful.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the schlieffen plan designed to do
seropon [69]

Answer: The Schlieffen Plan is a military plan of Germany in the First World War.

Explanation:

In particular, Schlieffen plan to fight along the western front of, more precisely, France. The German Supreme Military Staff's goal, drafted by experienced military personnel, gave a positive result at the beginning of the war, and French troops were pushed into the interior of the country. However, a sudden counterattack, organized from the Paris suburbs, soon followed, making the German troops. The fighting then concentrated in the Marne River area, which was the border between the two enemy armies. It is on the Marne War that the trench warfare will continue for years.

5 0
3 years ago
How does Nato tie in with the cold war being inevitable
ANEK [815]
<span>The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) was created in 1949. NATO was seen as being a viable military deterrent against the military might of the Soviet Union. In response to NATO admitting the membership of West Germany, the Soviet Union was to gather all its client states in Eastern Europe into the Warsaw Pact in May 1955  so in my opinion if this had not happened the cold was would have been avoided </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did crusades change the social structure of Europe
    7·1 answer
  • Why would white southerners pass laws that controlled the movement of african americans?
    15·1 answer
  • What caused conflict among Christians in Europe?
    10·1 answer
  • What is meant by cotton is king? How did its sovereignty extend beyond the south? What implications did its rule have?
    10·1 answer
  • 3. Which of the following was considered a push factor for the migration patterns of the 20th century?
    14·1 answer
  • What event caused four additional southern states to secede from the union?
    10·1 answer
  • What areas did Progressives think we were in need of the greatest reform? (list 3-4)
    8·1 answer
  • As the Horatii brothers pledge an oath to their father to fight to the death, their sister Camilla watches in grief. Why could s
    8·1 answer
  • What was a result of the changing economy of the north during the mid- 1800’s
    15·2 answers
  • What does a state work with to share the costs of important social services?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!