1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Julli [10]
3 years ago
10

This 1974 Supreme Court case held that executive privilege may not be invoked to deny the courts access to evidence needed in a

criminal proceeding.
History
2 answers:
lbvjy [14]3 years ago
8 0
United States v. Nixon
Pani-rosa [81]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The 1974 Supreme Court case that held that executive privilege may not be invoked to deny the courts access to evidence needed in a criminal proceeding was United States v. Nixon.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Nixon of 1974 is a landmark decision on the limits of the powers of the President of the United States in relation to the other branches of government and to the domestic information system.

As part of the Watergate affair, President Nixon was asked by the Special Investigator and later by Congress to publish tapes recorded in the White House, which could have contributed to the investigation of the affair. Nixon, however, refused to release the tapes and instead offered copies of some of the recordings. The Judge of the District Court for Washington DC insisted on the release of the tapes, and the dispute eventually came before the Supreme Court of the United States.

The Supreme Court had to decide whether the legislature or the judiciary had the right to demand that the President of the United States, and thus the executive, publish it, or whether, as Nixon argued, this would violate the principle of separation of powers.

In its unanimous decision, the Supreme Court first made it clear that it had the competence to determine to what extent the United States Constitution restricts the powers of the President, and that the Constitution provides that laws may be enforced against the President. With regard to the executive power of the President, it stated that, in any case, it would not be given priority when it comes to the publication of evidence that is demonstrably relevant in criminal proceedings. So the tapes had to be released.

You might be interested in
3. How was was slavery in the colonies different than slavery in Africa?
Pie

Answer:

Explanation:

Hi

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the map, Italy in the early 19th century was under the control of Austria. under the control of Spain. united as th
Lyrx [107]

Answer:

Split into kingdoms and city-states.

Explanation:

In the early 19th century, Italy was split into several small kingdoms, princedoms and city-states, and this had been the political reality of Italy since the Middle Ages.

Some of these smaller Italian states were under the control of foreign powers, like Piedmont, which was controlled by Savoy. However, most of them were more or less independent.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was the boycott successful? who helped? how was is succeful?
ELEN [110]

Answer: <u>Brainliesss plsssssss</u>

was the boycott successful? yes he was successful

who helped?  Martin Luther King, Jr.

how was is successful? Rosa Parks

Explanation:

was the boycott successful? Following a November 1956 ruling by the Supreme Court that segregation on public buses was unconstitutional, the bus boycott ended successfully. It had lasted 381 days.

who helped? On December 1, 1955, Rosa Parks, a black seamstress, was arrested in Montgomery, Alabama for refusing to give up her bus seat so that white passengers could sit in it. ... Following a November 1956 ruling by the Supreme Court that segregation on public buses was unconstitutional, the bus boycott ended successfully.

how was is succeful? On December 1, 1955, Rosa Parks, a black seamstress, was arrested in Montgomery, Alabama for refusing to give up her bus seat so that white passengers could sit in it. ... Following a November 1956 ruling by the Supreme Court that segregation on public buses was unconstitutional, the bus boycott ended successfully.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was not considered a Union advantage during the Civil War?
Stels [109]

Answer:

A. more railroad lines

Explanation:

_______________________

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Chiến tranh lạnh kết thúc vào năm bao nhiêu
den301095 [7]

Answer:

1989

Explanation:

Chiến tranh lạnh bắt dầu từ năm 1947 với thông điệp của tổng thống Truman tại quốc hội Mĩ.

Đến tháng 12 – 1989, trong cuộc gặp gỡ không chính thức tại đảo Manta ( Địa Trung Hải), hai nhà lãnh đạo M. Goócbachốp và G. Busơ (cha) đã chính thức tuyên bố chấm dứt Chiến tranh lạnh.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
    7·2 answers
  • How do the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness limit the powers of
    15·1 answer
  • Did dust storms in Oklahoma in 1935 sometimes lift soil 8,000 feet high?
    13·1 answer
  • have government leaders and global citizens outlived the total depletion of resources as Thomas Malthus predicted?explain
    10·1 answer
  • Which documents were utilized when forming the US government? PICK MORE THAN ONE ANSWER
    10·2 answers
  • Name the Central Powers country and the Allied country that spent the most money on the war. Allied: Russia; Central Powers: Ger
    5·2 answers
  • Sino ang nagtatag ng bangko central ng pilipinas​
    5·1 answer
  • What changes took place in a country that was fighting a 'Total War?
    6·2 answers
  • Does the Supreme Court have too much power? Why?
    5·1 answer
  • NO LINKS PLEASE. How is socialism different from communism?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!