Yes, people were upset by such a high tax on many goods that they threw a lot of tea over board.
Answer:
A population-D
Explanation:
A population is referred to a large collection of individuals or objects that is the main focus of an experiment or scientific research query. It is also called A research population because it considers a defined collection of individuals or objects who have similar binding characteristics.
Professor DeVries randomly selected and interviewed 50 of the school's students of Oakbridge School. He is using a well defined collection of student with same characteristic ie same school . His study is using a Population. Note that "random" here implies a subset of a population.
Answer:
The correct answer is - conflict is resolved the differences are also resolved.
Explanation:
Cordial conflicts are the conflicts that occur inside an institution because of a lack of coordination among the staff members and students or the team members and it will reduce the amount of trust and loyalty among the members or students.
To reduce cordial conflicts is to establish trust and resolve the problems by dialogue among the members of the institution. It can be easily solved by developing a convincing and trustworthy relationship among the people by improving the terms of a good relationship.
Resolved conflict can also solve the problems within an institution and so it was a change in the previously hostile environment. Conflict results in people become angry tensed environment, but once this conflict is resolved the differences end and the environment becomes "normal" again.
<span>In recent years white prejudice has increased in rural parts of the US, while in more densely-populated urban areas white prejudice has declined. Studies show that simply by moving to a move urban and racially diverse city, white people become less likely to prejudge others based on race. This suggests that racism is perhaps due to lack of exposure to people of other races and is a form of experiential ignorance. The reasons for white prejudice seem to be caused mostly by the spread of misinformation and hate speech, where white supremacist figureheads will blame any number of problems on any race or group that they perceive as "other" or "outsiders". The internet has given these outspoken individuals an international soapbox from which to spout their racist rhetoric, which may have caused an increase in the intensity of believe seen among some groups of white prejudiced Americans. However, the internet has also given a platform for many more rational thinkers who preach tolerance, acceptance, and the value of diversity in society. This is considered mainstream academic thought in the US today, which was not the case just 50 years ago. In that regard, white prejudice has decreased as a function of the overall population of the US. Similar trends have been observed in other countries which were previously predominantly white and have recently seen a much larger spike in racial and ethnic diversity. For example, in Germany, white prejudice has starkly decreased over the past 100 years. Less than a century ago, a large number of Germans were participating in race-based genocide on their own soil. Today, Germany has a culture of acceptance and semi-open borders. In 2016, Germany's leader Angela Merkel opened Germany's borders to thousands of refugees escaping Syria. The majority of these refugees were non-white, and were accepted by the German people. This scenario would not have been possible in German culture 50 years ago.</span>
Realist and Liberal perspectives would agree that the international system is inherently anarchic
The notion that there is no supreme authority or sovereign in the world is known as anarchy in the study of international relations. There is no hierarchically superior, coercive authority that can settle conflicts, uphold the law, or regulate the system of international politics in an anarchic state. It is commonly acknowledged that anarchy serves as the foundation for international relations theory.
It is feasible for ordered ties between nations to be maintained in an anarchic international system, contrary to how anarchy is typically understood in the field of international relations. For the realist, liberal, neo- realist, and neo- liberal models of international relations, anarchy provides the underpinnings.
To learn more about Anarchy click here:
brainly.com/question/1133894
#SPJ4
