Answer:
1. The Federalist believed that there is no need for inclusion of Bill of Rights. This is based on the perception that Constitution restricted the government not the individuals or citizens.
2. The Anti- Federalists argued that the Constitution bestowed the central government enormous power, which, in the absence of Bill of Rights, can be exploited at the detriment of the people
Explanation:
1. The Federalists believed that there is no need for inclusion of the Bill of Rights. This is based on the perception that the Constitution restricted the government, not the individuals or citizens. - The Federalists which was spearheaded by the likes of Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, wrote various documents termed as "Federalist papers" (sometimes referred to as Publius) where they argued their case against the Bill of Rights. Their conclusion was that the Bill of Rights would only impede the rights of the people rather than safeguard them.
2. The Anti- Federalists argued that the Constitution bestowed the central government enormous power, which, in the absence of the Bill of Rights, can be exploited at the detriment of the people - These group of people argued their case in various papers termed as Brutus, Centinel etc. One of the major personality in this camp is Patrick Henry.
Their submissions amongst others, were that the new constitution can turn the central government to be a threat to their individual liberties.
Around 500 B.C.E in Hinduism, a ritual had been improperly performed if a prayer was not answered. Hinduism also believes that truth is eternal, the Vedas are the ultimate authority, Moksha is the goal of the individual soul, Brahman is truth and reality, individual souls are immortal and everyone should strive to achieve dharma.
<span />
Answer:
D. gained new territories.
Explanation:
When the United States won the Spanish-American War, they annexed new territories. Adding these new territories helped U.S. influence grow in the world.
Answer: this amendment gives privacy because soil sees just can’t enter your home as a safe house during war.
Explanation:
Answer:
In my opinion, skyscrapers have a negative effect on modern life.
Explanation:
I think there are multiple reasons that skyscrapers have a negative affect. But one is that there are usally multiple businesses inside of them, wich means that a large amount of people need to get there, wich leads to more cars and other transportation. Wich then causes air polution.
(don't know if this was the type of answer you were looking for.)
