All categories

4 years ago

An effect of transportation improvements on settlements was that

Business

2 answers:

kaheart [24]4 years ago

7 0

Answer: People became more willing to live farther from their work

Explanation: apex ;)

e-lub [12.9K]4 years ago

6 0

The development in transportation help the settlers reach the place that cannot be reached before.

It also make the people became more willing to live in a pretty far distance for their workplace, which increase the number of settlements even in places that have lesser amount of job opportunities. (since people can commute between their home and their workplaces everyday)

You might be interested in

Suppose an American buys stock issued by an Argentinian corporation. The Argentinian firm uses the proceeds from the sale to bui

faltersainse [42]

Answer:

Policies consistent with the goal of increasing productivity and growth in developing countries are:

1. Protecting property rights and enforcing contracts

2. Providing tax breaks and patents for firms that pursue research and development in health and sciences

Explanation:

To increase productivity and growth in developing countries, it is important that developing countries enhance the mechanisms for protecting property rights and enforcing contracts. These are the bases for attracting more foreign direct investments. The court system should be a system where justice is obtained and a system which can enforce the rights of individuals to own property. Without this basic ingredient, foreign direct investments will be hard to attract.

4 0

4 years ago

If net operating income is $83,000, average operating assets are $415,000, and the minimum required rate of return is 13%, what

tester [92]

Answer:

$29,050

Explanation:

The computation of the residual income is shown below:

Residual income = Net operating income - Minimum required income

= $83,000 - $53,950

= $29,050

Here

Minimum required income = Average operating assets × Minimum required rate of return

= $415,000 × 13%

= $53,950

This should be the answer and the options provided are wrong

6 0

3 years ago

ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the

Ymorist [56]

Answer:

ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the professor explained that the true cost of going to college includes both the tuition I pay as well as something called the "opportunity cost" of going to college. I don't understand. I pay $32,000 per year in tuition. The tuition is what I pay to the school, so it seems like that should be my true cost!

HUBERT: Hi, Eric. Many concepts in economics can be confusing at first. Let's talk it through.

Economists think of costs a bit differently than just the dollar amount that you pay. To an economist, the true cost of college includes the total value of what you give up in order to acquire your college education. In other words, not only did you give up the tuition money that you paid, but by attending college, you gave up opportunities to do other things with your time as well. This is where the idea of opportunity cost comes from.

The opportunity cost of your decision to go to college is the value of the next best alternative that you gave up. Suppose that your next best alternative to college is to work as a cashier. By not going to college, and taking this job, you could earn $16,000 per year. Then your opportunity cost of college is $16,000, and your total cost of a year of college is $48,000 per year.

ERIC: I think I get it now. So when I take into account the opportunity cost of college, the true cost is actually more than just the tuition.

HUBERT: Correct. Thinking about costs in this way will help you make more rational decisions in your everyday life. Now tell me, how can you explain your decision to go to college?

ERIC: I chose to go to college because, for me, the value of a year in college gives me a higher stand and offers me a better long-term opportunity that someone without a college degree.

Explanation:

The question poses a discussion about the opportunity cost of attending college. The understanding behind this is that by choosing to go to college, Eric is forfeiting the opportunity to get a job as a cashier that would earn him $16,000 a year while incurring his college fees of $32,000. Therefore, the total cost of attending college to him should be $48,000.

3 0

3 years ago

Importance of the study of organisational buyer behaviour to the personal selling function

ladessa [460]

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

The importance of the study of organizational buyer behavior to the personal selling function is that the personal seller can easily realize the expectation of the organizations.

It also assists in determining what makes organizations buy a certain product.

It gives the seller the proper ideas on the type of products preferred by organization buyers such that they can quickly make them available.

It also ensures the seller understands how the organization buyer operates in terms of payments, quality, quantity, and the purpose in which they are buying.

4 0

3 years ago

Ferguson Company recognized $400 of estimated manufacturing overhead costs at the end of the month. How does this transaction af

nadezda [96]

Answer:

This leads to a reduction in net income

Explanation:

Manufacturing overheads refer to those costs which indirectly relate to a good's production. Examples of manufacturing overheads would include depreciation charged on equipments used for production, rent of the factory wherein production takes place.

The effect of recognition of $400 of estimated manufacturing overheads would be reduction in net income since their recognition raises the cost of production which reduces gross profit. Consequently this would reduce the net income.

8 0

3 years ago