1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BabaBlast [244]
3 years ago
14

There is no civics section so help me!

History
1 answer:
nalin [4]3 years ago
6 0
Answer:

1. No chief executive made a lack of federal order
2. No national court system meant that problems among states couldn't be fixed
3. <span>any amendments to the Articles must be approved by all 13 states which made it nearly impossible to make any changes</span>
You might be interested in
Which term can be defined as rule by the people
Naya [18.7K]
Democracy hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
Explain the feudal system​
Delvig [45]

Answer:

The feudal system was a way of organising society into different groups based on their roles. It had the king at the top with all of the control, and the peasants at the bottom doing all of the work.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which person or group has fought against a similar
Crazy boy [7]

Answer:

Emma Gonzalez

Explanation:

5 0
1 year ago
Congress opposed President Johnson in several ways, including:
yarga [219]
Taking over the plans for Reconstruction.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did different religious groups gain protection under Muslim rulers?
Rzqust [24]

Answer:

To begin, we need to first grasp the basic terminology relevant to the study of religious minorities. Religious minorities are known as dhimmīs, short for ahl al-dhimmah, or people of the dhimmah, a term that later became synonymous with the People of the Book.[4] The original meaning of al-dhimmah, however, meant protection, and it was often short for dhimmat–Allah wa-rasūlih, or the “protection of God and His Prophet.”[5] In short, the concept originally had a divine connotation, or a meaning that was directly related to the power of God. However, the concept soon morphed into a technical legal term with the progression of classical scholarship, and it consequently lost its transcendent dimension.[6] As a result, ahl al-dhimmah, or people of the dhimmah, has become a legal term and not a reference to the recipients of divine protection. It is important to discuss the etymology of the word because it demonstrates the significance of the people of the dhimmah who, at the very root of it all, are people who were to be protected on behalf of God and His Prophet ﷺ – an immense responsibility. This status is awarded to People of the Book (who according to many scholars includes Zoroastrians and others) who agree through contract to pay the jizyah, or poll-tax, in exchange for that protection.[7] In sum, the formation of the people of the dhimmah was rooted in religious minorities paying a tax that exempted them from military service. Much more nuance can be embedded within all of these terms that are sometimes highly contested among scholars, but considering the limited scope of this paper, we will move forward to address the larger picture at hand.

The power of the Muslim state was dependent on its ability to provide two precious resources to its people: security and justice.[8] Christians and Jews and other minorities were not technically citizens of the Muslim state; they were considered outsiders under the protection of the state, leading to the title of dhimmah, or protected people.[9] Their protection was guaranteed in a number of ways: by providing them with legal autonomy – meaning they could maintain their religious practices without interference – and protection during war. That said, there have no doubt been incidents throughout history in which that protection was threatened or revoked and the Muslim ruler engaged in persecution of religious minorities.[10] The fact remains, however, that there was never widespread systematic persecution of Christians, for example, in the Islamic world as there was in the late Roman Empire.[11] And the hostile circumstances that did occasionally arise, were not due to Islamic legislation per se, but were rather a result of an amalgam of social, political, and economic circumstances. So while Christians historically at times suffered at the hands of Muslims, it was almost never a result of their being Christian, or their beliefs, but a result of various factors related to the pursuit of power.[12]

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do the decisions you make as a consumer affect the economy
    12·2 answers
  • Which option best completes the diagram?
    6·2 answers
  • The Identical sections of the two documents both say that their arguments is based in which laws
    7·2 answers
  • Which factor explains the tremendous growth of the southern slave population between 1790 and 1860?
    8·1 answer
  • Which is the greatest river system in North America?
    15·2 answers
  • Was the convention of 1845 voted on annexation and drafted a new Texas constitution??
    12·2 answers
  • Which statement best completes the diagram?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the result of new leadership and continued communism in China?
    10·2 answers
  • History please solve
    14·2 answers
  • I need help if anyone can give me a hand it’ll be much appreciated
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!