Jim Crow Laws enforced segregation between black and white people. The court case "Plessy Vs Ferguson" was trying to please people by enforcing the "separate but equal" law. Basically, they wanted to make the two races separate, but they thought it would be fine as long as both places were the same in quality and quantity.
To sum it up, Jim Crow Laws were to separate the two, but black people were given schools that weren't as good, trashy bathrooms, etc. It was also made to make sure that black people could not go some places on certain days, or at all. The "Plessy vs Ferguson" case was to try to make it better by separating the races, but having both bathrooms the same and both schools the same so none is better than the other.
I hope I helped.
Napoleon replaced existing Monarchs with members of his own family. His aim was to replace existing empire with one of his, which would have made him and his family rule wholly. Resistance to to French occupation and French puppet rulers was often based on nationalist sentiments, but it's doubtful whether it would have remained a popular cause with the masses after Napoleon's final defeat.
The correct answer is Madison is showing the superiority of a republic over a democracy
Explanation: He was called the "Father of the Constitution," Madison said the document was not "a single brain product" but "the work of many heads and many hands".
In Congress, he helped draft the Bill of Rights. And from his opposition to Hamilton's financial proposals, the Republican or Jeffersonian Party developed.
Answer:
I would say c. building and roads systems
