2 years ago

How were the royal colonies different from corporate colonies

2 answers:

8 0

Answer:

Royal colonies were founded under a royal charter. Their governor and colonial council were appointed by the king of England. Such charters provided for a representative assembly and support for the Church of England. Corporate charters, on the other hand, were granted by the king to a company of investors. The management of a corporate colony was up to the directors and shareholders of the company.

Explanation:

Liula [17]2 years ago

4 0

Corporate colonies were ran by joint stocks thus allowing investors to have a vote on how they would like the colony to be ran. Royal colonies were under the direct order of the monarchy (King+Queen).

You might be interested in

D day was the day the axis invasion france and established beachheads true or false

Stells [14]

False. D-Day (<span>6th June 1944) was actually the day the Allies invaded Normandy (France). </span>

8 0

3 years ago

Which Hebrew leader introduced the Ten Commandments?

Svetradugi [14.3K]

The answer is Moses.

Hope this helps you!!! :)

4 0

3 years ago

should have some part of Oklahoma territory become an all black state? why or why not? compare the potential advantages and disa

Aleks [24]

No, because that would be discrimination and who knows what would be different

7 0

3 years ago

What kind of government did the United States have after it declared independence?

aleksandr82 [10.1K]

After it declared independence from Great Britain, the United States had a "republic" form of government, since the Founding Fathers wanted to ensure that tyranny was not allowed to form.

6 0

2 years ago

Who was the grandson of babur and what kind of ruler was he?

slavikrds [6]

Babur role was battles of panipat. Babur father ruled the small principality of the Fergana to the north of the Hindu Kush mountain range. Babur followed in his father footstep

6 0

2 years ago