How were the royal colonies different from corporate colonies

History

2 answers:

SVETLANKA909090 [29]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Royal colonies were founded under a royal charter. Their governor and colonial council were appointed by the king of England. Such charters provided for a representative assembly and support for the Church of England. Corporate charters, on the other hand, were granted by the king to a company of investors. The management of a corporate colony was up to the directors and shareholders of the company.

Explanation:

Liula [17]2 years ago

4 0

Corporate colonies were ran by joint stocks thus allowing investors to have a vote on how they would like the colony to be ran. Royal colonies were under the direct order of the monarchy (King+Queen).

You might be interested in

Were plantation owners with many slaves considered wealthy?

vova2212 [387]

yes, because they had more slaves they could get a lot of their work done faster and this helped them produce more materials faster as well. they never ran out of materials because the slaves were always working fast. this made the plantation owners very rich.

5 0

3 years ago

Lincoln differed from Congress in his ideas of Reconstruction in that he ___________________.

babunello [35]

Was opposed to slavery

4 0

3 years ago

How did the geography of Greece present obstacles to the development of a large Greek Empire?

mash [69]

The surrounding seas, mountains, islands, and climate divided Greece into communities

6 0

3 years ago

Please Help!!!!

lions [1.4K]

Answer: Bull run

Explanation: The first battle of bull run (also known as the first battle

of Manassas) was the first major land battle of the civil war

7 0

2 years ago

Do people in america have the ability to act according to his/her will

Nat2105 [25]

Answer:

Do people in america have the ability to act according to his/her will

Explanation:

yes

3 0

2 years ago