How were the royal colonies different from corporate colonies

History

2 answers:

SVETLANKA909090 [29]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Royal colonies were founded under a royal charter. Their governor and colonial council were appointed by the king of England. Such charters provided for a representative assembly and support for the Church of England. Corporate charters, on the other hand, were granted by the king to a company of investors. The management of a corporate colony was up to the directors and shareholders of the company.

Explanation:

Liula [17]3 years ago

4 0

Corporate colonies were ran by joint stocks thus allowing investors to have a vote on how they would like the colony to be ran. Royal colonies were under the direct order of the monarchy (King+Queen).

You might be interested in

maria [59]

Their Isolation left them far behind Europe.

4 0

3 years ago

During the Gupta Empire, Hindu beliefs were strongly supported over Buddhism. Which of the following was a result?

vampirchik [111]

A: because during the guys empire they did belief Hindu was strongly supported

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Inflation is defined as a rise in the general level of prices. When inflation occurs, the buying power of the dollar would

I am Lyosha [343]

Answer:

decrease

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What role does the law of supply and demand play in a command economy?

Delicious77 [7]

Answer:

feet

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Question 1

ra1l [238]

Answer: These roles are: (1) chief of state, (2) chief executive, (3) chief administrator, (4) chief diplomat, (5) commander in chief, (6) chief legislator, (7) party chief, and (8) chief citizen. Chief of state refers to the President as the head of the government. He is the symbol of all the people.The Constitution explicitly assigns the president the power to sign or veto legislation, command the armed forces, ask for the written opinion of their Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors.

Your answer is B

Hope I helped

Explanation:The president does have the power to veto acts of Congress,appoint diplomats and judges act as commander in chief of the Armed Forces and recommend legislation to Congress HOWEVER according to the US Constitution HeDOES NOT have the power to resign and choose his successor

I wish you good luck on your exam

8 0

2 years ago