Answer:
different
Explanation:
There is a significant difference in small firms leadership compared to large firms depending on legal structures, number of employees in a firm and financial availability.
Large firms have more departments, employees, and operations compared to small ones. For instance, the leadership style and structure required to manage operations and employees in large firms will need to be highly structured to ensure there is effective command and information flow. For small firms, a simple command and communication flow structure will suffice as the number of employees and departments involved are few.
Answer:
Economist A
Explanation:
Elasticity is a measure of investment sensitivity. If the investment is elastic, a slight increase in price (interest rate) will decrease the amount of investment. Conversely, if the investment is inelastic, a change in interest rates will not considerably affect the investment rate. The calculation of elasticity consists of the change in the investment rate divided by the change in the interest rate. If the calculation of elasticity is less than 1, it is considered ineastic, while investments with elasticity above 1 are considered elastic. Thus, economist A believes that the investment rate is elastic to the interest rate, while economist B believes the opposite. So for economist A the rise in interest rates will affect the investment rate of the economy (and hence the macroeconomic environment) because in his view investment is elastic. Economist B does not believe that interest rate fluctuations will affect demand for investments.
Your answer is d.should deduct toe outstanding fees from the refund expected.
If new york city imposed a 50 cent tax on soft-drink beverages that contain sugar or high-fructose corn syrup, it would decrease the demand of the soft-drink beverages.
Given that new york city imposed a 50 cent tax on soft-drink beverages that contain sugar or high-fructose corn syrup.
We are required to find the effect of 50% tax on soft-drink beverages that contain sugar or high-fructose corn syrup.
When 50% tax is imposed on soft-drink beverages then it will increase the price of soft drink beverages, which will decrease the demand of soft drink beverages because now the drink become costly for the customers to buy.
Suppose the initial price of 1 soft drink is $100.
Now tax is applied so tax would be 100*50%=50
Price after tax=100+50
=$150
Now consumers have to pay $150 for 1 drink in place of $100.
Hence if new york city imposed a 50 percent tax on soft-drink beverages that contain sugar or high-fructose corn syrup, it would decrease the demand of the soft-drink beverages.
Learn more about tax at brainly.com/question/25783927
#SPJ4
