Services performed (July 31) - $1,700
Deprivation of equipment (July) - $180
Insurance partially paid (July) - $1,800
Inventory count (July 31) - $1,220
Employee salaries (July) - $400
Total cost in July - $ 5,300
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
The productivity increased from 0.89 carts pwe worker per hour to 0.93 arts per worker per hour.
Explanation:
5 worked make 80 carts per hour
Worker receive $10 dollar per hour = $50 dollars wages epxense
Machine cost $40 dollar per hour
A worked is crow-out from factory and the equipment cost increased by $10
The total cost still is $90 dollars but the output now is 84 carts
Labor Productivity (before purchase of new equipment)
80 carts
(5 wkrs .∗$ 10 per hr .)+$ 40
= 0.89 carts per worker per hour
Labor Productivity (after purchase of new equipment)
84 carts
(4 wkrs .∗$ 10 per hr .)+$ 50
= 0.93 carts per worker per hour
<u>Question missing:</u>
Compute labor productivity under each system (before and after the purchase of new equipment). <u>Use carts per worker per hour</u> as the measure of labor productivity.
A manufacturer changes inputs into goods sold to customers.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This affirmation above is backed up by a famous phrase which stated — a falsehood stops to be a falsehood when the parties involved knows it is just a tactics. This implies that it isn't aimed at treating the party involved as a mere means to make profit.
Answer:
D.restrictive covenant.
Explanation:
Restrictive covenant is a clause in an employment contract, which prohibit employee from taking favor or benefit of ex employer´s brand, data, information, etc. This help the employer to protect its data and information from being misuse or used against them.
This clause also ristrict employee from working for a direct competitive company.
It also ristrict employee from poaching client or business from the ex employer´s company.
It also ristrict employee from being in direct contact with client or vendors.
