I think it’s a not sure tho
Answer:
The addition of the Bill of Rights shortly after the Constitution was adopted
Explanation:
Because the Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791, and the fact that Bill of Rights in the United States helps to protect human rights, including the protection of privacy and liberties.
Hence, when a Georgian, Gazette of the State of Georgia, November 15, 1787, described the lapses of the federal constitution, it was clamoring for a bill of rights that was later ratified.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
The Russo-Japanese War developed out of the rivalry between Russia and Japan for dominance in Korea and Manchuria. In 1898 Russia had pressured China into granting it a lease for the strategically important port of Port Arthur (now Lüshun), at the tip of the Liaodong Peninsula, in southern Manchuria.
