1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lawyer [7]
4 years ago
8

 Explain the positives and negatives of modernization in Middle Eastern countries

History
2 answers:
dusya [7]4 years ago
7 0
Positives include the amount of Oil some countries have . That makes the economy bring in more money . 

Negatives, there still isn't a lot of technology for everyone so they can't connect to the rest of the world and possibly make the country better (improving speed )
ExtremeBDS [4]4 years ago
6 0
Well a positive for "modernization", better worded as "westernization" would be that their economies would flourish, their wouldn't be as many rouge extremist organizations running around. But a major downside to this, which is why we are currently in the middle of a "war on terror" with them is because they don't want us there, they don't want to "westernize". They believe that it would violate their beliefs and islamist traditions, which it certainly would.
You might be interested in
What was the U.S. response to the bombing of Pearl Harbor?
ExtremeBDS [4]

america declared war on japan and joined the allies

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statements about the events of September 11, 2001 are accurate?
belka [17]
The answer will be A ,
8 0
2 years ago
Did john marshall go beyond the constitution when he applied judicial review in marbury
BaLLatris [955]
Numerous originalists would reply "yes," on the grounds that legal audit isn't listed as an energy of the Judicial Branch in the Constitution. 


Then again, the legal audit was at that point a setup training when the Constitution was composed, and the Framers, a significant number of whom were attorneys with information of court method, didn't expressly disallow it. Article III makes no say of how the Judicial Branch should practice statute. The absence of direction has a tendency to infer the Framers deliberately permitted adaptability and a level of independence in deciding the courts' operation. In the event that they had no aim for the Judicial Branch to go about as a mind the energy of the other two branches, they could have set more unequivocal rules for the legal to take after.
5 0
4 years ago
What is the opportunity cost of changing production from 10 chairs To 40 chairs
alex41 [277]
Can someone heelp me
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best exemplifies the public opinion of Herbert Hoover during the presidential election of 1932?
romanna [79]

Answer:1.) C

2.) C

3.) A

4.) A

5.) short answer

6.) D

7.) B

8.) short answer

9.) B

10.) A,D

11.) C

Explanation:

Just took the quiz and failed, hope this helps!

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • To speak out against
    9·2 answers
  • How was a Greek state different from a city
    7·2 answers
  • Why have archaeologists and historians criticized the building of the Three Gorges Dam?
    7·1 answer
  • Who is the first chief minister in anguilla
    6·1 answer
  • How did cotton affect the northern economy during the civil war?​
    6·1 answer
  • the information in the map suggests that the black death spread to europe as a result of contacts with
    11·1 answer
  • If you were a Cuban in 1901, how would you have viewed Roosevelt's Corollary or American Imperialism? Would you think American i
    9·1 answer
  • What do Muslims believe a prophet is?
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement best completes the diagram shwoing the development of modern democracy
    5·1 answer
  • Para sa akin ang karapatan ay?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!