A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
Thou have to much recoil and the west Morgan the west Morgan game and play
Answer:
Compromises and Act.
Explanation:
The compromises and Act were related to the question of slavery. The South relied on agriculture and took the slavery system as legal to generate wealth. Whereas the North were against the practice of slavery they considered it evil because it bound people to their masters without having rights and freedom.
Missouri Compromise became the first compromise related to slavery. The Compromise established Missouri as a slave and Maine as a free state. The purpose of the compromise was to maintain the balance of power in the Senate.
The westward migration in California led the government to introduce the compromise of 1850. The Compromise of 1850 reduced the political dispute over slavery in new territories after the Mexican-American War.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act passed by the government in 1854. It allowed Kansas and Nebraska to decide whether to allow slavery or not.
The Articles of Confederation was served as the United States' first written plan of government.
