Madison fear “a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department” of government because he feel worry about the lack of control the abuses of government.
<h3>
Further explanation
</h3>
According to Federalist Paper no. 51, James Madison (1751-1836) worrries about how to create institutions that would check personal ambition and the "encroachment" of one branch of government by the other:
<em>"But the great security against a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department, consists in giving to those who administer each department, the necessary constitutional means, and personal motives, to resist encroachments of the others… Ambition must be made to counteract ambition. The interest of the man, must be connected with the constitutional rights of the place. It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government."</em>
American Revolution in the 18th century have attempt to solve two of the most significant problems in political theory, such as how to guard against the very people who were created to guard us, and the problem of keeping a government with limited powers.
The solution the Founding Fathers came from the thought of the French theorist Montesquieu which is separating the powers of the state into different branches
<h3>
Learn more</h3>
- Learn more about Federalist Paper brainly.com/question/841636
<h3>
Answer details</h3>
Grade: 9
Subject: history
Chapter: Federalist Paper
Keywords: Federalist Paper
Answer:
The Roman model of governance inspired many political thinkers over the centuries, and today's modern representative democracies imitate more the Roman than the Greek models because it was a state in which supreme power was held by the people and their elected representatives, and which had an elected or nominated ...
Answer:
Recognize the Byzantine emperor as his superior
Explanation:
Most of the time war is started over a country’s want for power or more land, it’s not often that a war’s main focus is that the opposing side is morally “bad”. In WW2 we often look back and see it through the Lens of the Allied forces fighting against the evil Axis powers but almost if not all of the conflict was started by the axis powers trying to obtain land, it was only later when people learned about the interment camps and horrible human rights violations that anyone really though of WW2 as a fight against evil.
Wars tend to be interpreted very differently depending on the side you ask since a lot of the time both or neither side is fully morally correct in their reasons for fighting.
Hope that helped!
<u> A. Protection from arrest without cause</u>
The Petition of Right (1628) was a petition from the English Parliament to King Charles I, to put a halt on his abuses of power. <u>One of its provisions included protecting people from arrest without a just cause</u>. The other three provisions were that no taxation would be imposed without the consent of Parliament, no subject had to provide living quarters to soldiers and no martial law should be enacted in peacetime.