What are the problems with a strong Central government and a small limited government? What is the solution

1 answer:

4 0

Hiya,

A strong Central government is bad because if the government releases a law that just so happens to be bad, it will apply to everyone and this could be horrible for the whole country. If state decisions are bad, it won't hurt the whole nation but only that said state. People fear a strong Central government might even overpower small state governments and lose independence.

Now the trouble with a limited government is that it takes time to make decisions and fraud can easily happen. With a limited government there is also limited happiness.

A solution to this would be to just have a little bit of both. Limited government can increase fairness and give more freedom and power to their people and kick out the terrible leaders whereas a strong central government you can also have the security and freedom.

Hope this helps, government was never fun tbh.

You might be interested in

There were 13 original states. Select three states that were among the original 13. Massachusetts Tennessee Rhode Island Texas F

Naddika [18.5K]

Massachusetts Rhode Island and New York

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Diferencia entre monarquia y democracia?

denis23 [38]

En la democracia el poder reside en el pueblo, en la monarquía en el Rey.
No se pueden citar las actuales monarquías parlamentarias como por ejemplo las de Inglaterra y España, donde la Reina o el Rey no tienen poder de decisión, sino que son de carácter simbólico y representativo.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Blackstone's Commentaries on the Law is most well know for explaining

kondaur [170]

Answer:

- Common laws

- Precedent

Explanation:

'Blackstone's Commentaries on the Law of England' is popularly known for elaborating the 'common law.' It is characterized as the 'law about the law' which implies that the text penned by Sir William Blackstone functioned to establish the extensive principles of truth, integrity, and justice.

'Precedent' is characterized as the prior decision or judgment of the court that is used as a citation, analogy, or example to resolve a similar dispute in the future. Thus, it allows in developing better assimilation of the law and take future decisions(in similar cases) by using precedents as the reference.

5 0

2 years ago

Si comprara una botella de jugo de naranja que dijera "agitar antes de usar", ¿sería heterogénea u homogénea?

N76 [4]

Answer:

heterogeneous

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

The united states does not trade with which Latin american country

jeka94

However, United States imports from the trade agreement countries were Jess in 1938 than 1937 in every case except Haiti and Honduras, and United States exports also dropped except to Honduras, Colombia and Costa Rica.

7 0

2 years ago