Answer:
It was the Thornton Affair im quite sure.
Explanation:
It seems that your question missed the necessary options, but anyway, here is the answer that would complete the statement. The correct answer would be low and high, respectively. The avoiding style of conflict resolution is based on a low degree of assertiveness and a high <span>degree of cooperativeness. Hope this answer helps.</span>
Answer:
introduce her son to multiple stimuli.
Explanation:
Lucy wants her son, Kyle, to have the best environment to help him reach his full potential. According to those who study early experiences and the brain, Lucy should introduce her son to multiple stimuli.
This would allow her son to get acquainted with a variety of environmental stimuli which would in turn increase his understanding and adaptation to different forms of nature and its treats. He can reach his full potential only when he is familiar of most of the things that exist.
Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
<span>The best way to determing who is approaching before seeing them is to rely on other senses. For example, if your uncle never showers then you might be able to smell him even if you can't see him coming. In some cases it may also be possible to tell who is approaching by relying on knowledge about their habits. For example, if someone is coming through the door at six o'clock, and your father usually comes by at that time, then that person is probably your father.</span>
