Answer: A systematic sampling method.
Explanation.
The purpose s to obtain data that closely resembles that of the entire population. Because this is impractical, random sampling is used.
After determining what a reasonable sample size will be, the size of the population is divided by the sample size to obtain a sampling interval.
The random sample is obtained from the population at the calculated sampling interval.
Answer:
Ted Bundy left the teeth marks on the victim of Chi Omega's murder. This evidence was presented at the court and the match was found between the mark and Bundy's teeth. He was convinced for all the crimes, even though previous witness reports were often dismissed.
Explanation:
In the historic case of serial killer Ted Bundy, the physical evidence was crucial that determined his connection to the crime.
While there was already evidence from testimonies that Bundy can be connected to the various murders that he committed, including evidence of women who saw him leave with the weapon, the physical evidence was crucial at the end.
There were bite marks on one of the victim’s body, and the court insisted to compare those to the casting of Bundy’s teeth. He protested first, probably knowing there will be the match. As suspected,<u> the mark proved to be complementary with the cast of Bundy’s teeth, and a forensic odontologist confirmed the match.</u> Bundy’s teeth were chipped and misaligned, just like the ones that left the mark on the body. This was the only physical evidence found at the scene and it proved to be the crucial one. <u>Bundy was convicted of the murders and crimes he committed.</u>
We can see how crucial physical evidence here is, as Bundy was suspected before for various crimes,<u> even turned in by his girlfriend - his name, car, and appearance matched the records given by the victims and witnesses. </u>However, they were often dismissed by the police and attributed to the emotions and shock. <u>Yet, with this kind of hard physical evidence, it was finally determined Ted Bundy was the one who attacked and murdered the women.</u>
1 they were chosen by poular vote 2 i think D when there was a tie3 A common law
Pluralistic ignorance is most closely related to<u> Uncertainty condition</u> for social proof.
<h3>What is Pluralistic Ignorance?</h3>
Pluralistic ignorance is a significant cognitive fallacy that all individuals, some more than others, experience. It is the mistaken belief that one's thoughts or values are different than the perceived thoughts of the majority.
Pluralistic ignorance is connected to social norms and other aspects of public behavior. It is evidenced by situations in which individuals have one or more beliefs, values, or priorities that they believe differ from those of the rest of the members of the group.
When everyone in the group is uncertain and looking around for clues to appropriate behavior, the result can sometimes lead to "pluralistic ignorance."
Pluralistic ignorance occurs when individuals infer that the identical actions of the self and others reflect different internal stress.
<u>Three steps to pluralistic ignorance:</u>
- People self-censor. They do not always express their true thoughts and feelings for fear of embarrassment/rejection
- People incorrectly conclude others are expressing their true feelings and thoughts, even though they are censoring
- People conclude their own thoughts/feelings are not shared by others
Learn more about Pluralistic Ignorance on:
brainly.com/question/25735916
#SPJ4
